45 U.S.C. § 231v

Computation and certification of account benefit ratios

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 45 CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Initial computation and certificationOn or before November 1, 2003, the Railroad Retirement Board shall—(1) compute the account benefits ratios for each of the most recent 10 preceding fiscal years, and(2) certify the account benefits ratios for each such fiscal year to the Secretary of the Treasury.(b) Computations and certifications after 2003On or before November 1 of each year after 2003, the Railroad Retirement Board shall—(1) compute the account benefits ratio for the fiscal year ending in such year, and(2) certify the account benefits ratio for such fiscal year to the Secretary of the Treasury.(c) Definition

As used in this section, the term “account benefits ratio” has the meaning given that term in section 3241(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 [26 U.S.C. 3241(c)].

(Aug. 29, 1935, ch. 812, § 23, as added Pub. L. 107–90, title I, § 108(b), Dec. 21, 2001, 115 Stat. 890.)Editorial NotesPrior Provisions

A prior section 231v, act Aug. 29, 1935, ch. 812, § 23, as added Aug. 12, 1983, Pub. L. 98–76, title IV, § 418, 97 Stat. 438, provided that for purposes of Inspector General Act of 1978, the Railroad Retirement Board is an “establishment” and the Chairman of such Board the “head of the establishment”, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 100–504, title I, §§ 102(e)(3), 113, Oct. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 2517, 2530, effective 180 days after Oct. 18, 1988.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 1 case, 1991–1991 · leading case: Burlington N. R.R. v. Off. of Inspector Gen., 767 F. Supp. 1379 (N.D. Tex. 1991).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Burlington N. R.R. v. Off. of Inspector Gen., 767 F. Supp. 1379 (N.D. Tex. 1991). “The now repealed § 23 of the Railroad Retirement Act of 1974 (45 U.S.C. § 231v) created an inspector general for the Board who had powers, duties and limitations identical to those provided by the Inspector General Act of 1978.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.