45 U.S.C. § 718

Review by Congress

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 45 CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) General

The Board of Directors of the Association shall deliver the final system plan adopted by the Association to both Houses of Congress and to the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate. The final system plan shall be deemed approved at the end of the first period of 60 calendar days of continuous session of Congress after such date of transmittal unless either the House of Representatives or the Senate passes a resolution during such period stating that it does not favor the final system plan.

(b) Revised plan

If either the House or the Senate passes a resolution of disapproval under subsection (a) of this section, the Association, with the cooperation and assistance of the Secretary and the Office, shall prepare, determine, and adopt a revised final system plan. Each such revised plan shall be submitted to Congress for review pursuant to subsection (a) of this section.

(c) ComputationFor purposes of this section—(1) continuity of session of Congress is broken only by an adjournment sine die; and(2) the days on which either House is not in session because of an adjournment of more than 3 days to a day certain are excluded in the computation of the 60-day period.(d) Additions(1) The supplemental report, dated September 18, 1975, to the final system plan, and the provisions of the Association’s official errata supplement to the final system plan, dated December 1, 1975, including all designations made therein, shall be treated for all purposes as if they had been part of and included in the final system plan adopted by the Association and reviewed by the Congress. The final system plan shall, for all purposes, be deemed to be approved as modified and amended by such supplemental report and such supplement.(2) The Association may, upon petition of any State, modify the final system plan to make further designations with respect to rail properties of railroads in reorganization in the region designated for transfer to the Corporation under such plan, if such designations (A) are likely to result in improved rail service on such rail properties and connecting rail properties, and (B) would not materially impair the profitability of the Corporation. Such designations, including designations of such rail properties to a State, a profitable railroad, or a responsible person, may be made at any time prior to delivery of the final system plan to the special court under section 719(c) of this title. Such further designations shall be treated for all purposes as if they had been included in the final system plan adopted by the Association and reviewed by the Congress, and the final system plan shall for all purposes be deemed to be approved as modified by such designations. Any action of the Association with respect to any such petition shall not be subject to review by any court.(3)(A) Within 20 days after February 5, 1976, the Association may, by notice to the Congress and by publication in the Federal Register, modify, supplement, or add to the designations of rail properties in the final system plan if the Association finds such actions are necessary to—(i) achieve the efficient implementation of the final system plan, or(ii) provide for the offer to profitable railroads of rail properties designated in the final system plan to the Corporation, if such properties are not essential in the operation of other rail properties of the Corporation but are or would be integrally related to the operation of rail properties of (or which are offered pursuant to the final system plan to) such profitable railroad, or(iii) provide for the designation of additional rail properties to the Corporation or to a subsidiary thereof to enable the Corporation to serve efficiently a line of railroad designated to the Corporation in the final system plan if such line does not connect with any other line of railroad so designated to the Corporation or if such line would be served more efficiently as a consequence of such designation.Any designation to a profitable railroad pursuant to this paragraph shall comply with the second sentence of section 716(d)(4) of this title, and shall only be made upon a finding by the Association that such designation is integrally related to an offer of rail properties to a profitable railroad in the final system plan, that the goals of the final system plan require that the rail properties be operated as a part of the rail properties included in such offer, and that the implementation of such designation will not materially and adversely affect the impact of such offer on the profitability of the Corporation or any profitable railroad operating in the region. Any designation to a profitable railroad pursuant to this subsection, which amends any prior offer, shall terminate 30 days after February 5, 1976, unless, prior to such date, such profitable railroad has notified the Association in writing of its acceptance of such amendment to the prior offer.(B) If a line of railroad or any segment thereof is designated for rail service in the final system plan, no designation may be made by the Association pursuant to this paragraph which would result in such line or segment not being so designated. Any designations made pursuant to this paragraph shall be treated for all purposes as if they had been included in the final system plan adopted by the Association and reviewed by the Congress. The final system plan shall for all purposes be deemed to be approved as amended by such designations.(C) Any designations made pursuant to this paragraph shall not be subject to review by any court.(D) Any labor agreements entered into under section 778 11 See References in Text note below. of this title shall be subject to further negotiations for any modifications which may be necessary to implement designations made pursuant to this paragraph.(Pub. L. 93–236, title II, § 208, Jan. 2, 1974, 87 Stat. 999; Pub. L. 94–210, title VI, § 601(e), Feb. 5, 1976, 90 Stat. 84; S. Res. 4, Feb. 4, 1977; H. Res. 549, Mar. 25, 1980.)Editorial NotesReferences in Text

Section 778 of this title, referred to in subsec. (d)(3)(D), was repealed by Pub. L. 97–35, title XI, § 1144(a)(1), Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 669.

Amendments

1976—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 94–210 added subsec. (d).

Statutory Notes and Related SubsidiariesChange of Name

Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce of the House of Representatives changed to Committee on Energy and Commerce immediately prior to noon on Jan. 3, 1981, by House Resolution No. 549, Ninety-sixth Congress, Mar. 25, 1980. Committee on Energy and Commerce of House of Representatives treated as referring to Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of House of Representatives, in case of provisions of law relating to railroads, railway labor, or railroad retirement and unemployment, by section 1(c)(1) of Pub. L. 104–14, set out as a note preceding section 21 of Title 2, The Congress.

Committee on Commerce of the Senate abolished and replaced by Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate, effective Feb. 11, 1977. See Rule XXV of Standing Rules of the Senate, as amended by Senate Resolution No. 4 (popularly cited as the “Committee System Reorganization Amendments of 1977”), approved Feb. 4, 1977.

Abolition of Special Court, Regional Rail Reorganization Act of 1973, and Transfer of Functions

Special court abolished and all jurisdiction and functions transferred to United States District Court for District of Columbia, see section 719(b)(2) of this title.

Abolition of United States Railway Association and Transfer of Functions and Securities

See section 1341 of this title.

Applicability of National Environmental Policy Act

Application of National Environmental Policy Act to actions of Commission not affected by title VI of Pub. L. 94–210, see section 619 of Pub. L. 94–210, set out as a note under section 791 of this title.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 17 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1974–2022 · leading case: Reg'l Rail Reorganization Act Cases, 419 U.S. 102 (1974).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Reg'l Rail Reorganization Act Cases, 419 U.S. 102 (1974). · cites it 4× “" § 208, 45 U. S. C. § 718 (1970 ed., Supp. III). [11] Section 303 (d) provides: "(d) Appeal.”

People of the State of Illinois v. Consol. Rail Corp., 589 F.2d 1327 (7th Cir. 1979). · cites it 3× “As codified, this approval appears at 45 U.S.C. § 718 (d)(1). The 4-R Act also had the effect of revising parts of the 3-R Act, and the effect of some of these revisions is at issue in this appeal.”

Nat'l R.R. Passenger Corp. v. McDonald, 978 F. Supp. 2d 215 (S.D.N.Y. 2013). “45 U.S.C. §§ 718 , 719(a). The USRA then had 90 days to deliver the Final System Plan to the Special Court, a rail court created by the Rail Act, and to certify to the court the terms of the transfer.”

Nat'l R.R. Passenger Corp. v. Se. Pennsylvania Transp. Auth., 56 F.4th 129 (D.C. Cir. 2022). “See 45 U.S.C. § 718 (a). 4 “reserve[d] to ConRail appropriate trackage rights for the operation of commuter services” along the lines given to Amtrak, as well as a right to access and use associated “[s]tations, yards, [and] maintenance and service facilities.”

Consol. Rail Corp. v. RAY, EX REL. BOYD, 693 F. Supp. 2d 39 (D.D.C. 2010). “at 8; see also 45 U.S.C. § 718 (a). The Rail Act also called for the creation of a Special Court, which would have exclusive jurisdiction over proceedings relating to the Final System Plan.”

In the Matter of Erie Lackawanna Ry. Co., Debtor. Appeal of Consol. Rail Corp., 558 F.2d 339 (6th Cir. 1977). “The FSP was promulgated by USRA on July 26,1975 and was approved by Congress in the 1976 amendments to the Rail Act, § 208(d)(1), 45 U.S.C. § 718 (d)(1). Volume I of the FSP stated at 57; To facilitate an orderly transfer of business operations, Conrail management and the…”

Richard Drayton, John R. Sauerteig, & Sydney G. Stevens, as Escrow Agents of the Delaware & Bound Brook R.R. Co. v. United States, 801 F.2d 117 (3rd Cir. 1986). “999 (1974) codified at 45 U.S.C. § 718 (1982). USRA then submitted all of the Conrail securities and the requisite number of USRA obligations to a Special Court created by the Rail Act, Pub.”

Am. Premier Underwriters Inc. v. Gen. Elec. Co., 900 F. Supp. 2d 753 (S.D. Ohio 2012). “45 U.S.C. § 718 (a). The Rail Act also called for the creation of a Special Court, which would have exclusive jurisdiction over proceedings relating to the Final System Plan.”

State of NY v. Solvent Chem. Co., Inc., 6 F. Supp. 2d 186 (W.D.N.Y. 1998). “45 U.S.C. § 718 (a). Conrail was created by Congress specifically to take title to and operate certain rail properties and assets.”

Consol. Rail Corp. v. Penn Cent. Corp., 543 F. Supp. 457 (Regl. Rail Reorg. Act 1982). “NOTES [1] Section 208(a) of the Rail Act, 45 U.S.C. § 718 (a) deemed the FSP approved by Congress if neither the House nor the Senate passed a resolution stating that it did not favor the FSP within a certain period after the date of submission.”

Se. Pennsylvania Transp. Auth. v. Interstate Com. Comm'n, 644 F.2d 238 (3rd Cir. 1981). “3R Act § 208(a), currently codified at 45 U.S.C. § 718 (a) (1976). When the Final System Plan was submitted to Congress on July 26, 1975, neither house exercised its statutory opportunity to disapprove it, and it was therefore deemed approved.”

Consol. Rail Corp. v. Dicello, 121 B.R. 406 (Regl. Rail Reorg. Act 1990). “2616 (codified at 45 U.S.C.A. § 718 (d)(3) (West 1988)). . "The parties have been unable to agree upon the lines to be included in D & H's operating rights beyond Buffalo ‘FW’ (MP 422.”

Show all 17 citing cases →

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.