45 U.S.C. § 797m

Arbitration

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 45 CasesGoogle Scholar

Any dispute or controversy with respect to the interpretation, application, or enforcement of the provisions of this subchapter, except sections 797b, 797c, 797g, and 797l 11 See References in Text note below. of this title, or section 1144 of the Northeast Rail Service Act of 1981, and except those matters subject to judicial review under section 1152 of the Northeast Rail Service Act of 1981 [45 U.S.C. 1105], which have not been resolved within 90 days, may be submitted by either party to an Adjustment Board for a final and binding decision thereon as provided in section 153 of this title, in which event the burden of proof on all issues so presented shall be on the Corporation, or the Association, where appropriate.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 4 cases, 1983–1988 · leading case: United Transp. Union v. Consol. Rail Corp., 593 F. Supp. 1346 (Regl. Rail Reorg. Act 1984).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

United Transp. Union v. Consol. Rail Corp., 593 F. Supp. 1346 (Regl. Rail Reorg. Act 1984). “Plaintiffs seek a judgment declaring Section 714 of the Regional Rail Reorganization Act of 1973 (the “3R Act”), added by Section 1143(a) of the Northeast Rail Service Act of 1981 (“NRSA”), 45 U.S.C. § 797m, as the exclusive remedy for disputes arising under Sections 701, 702,…”

Beardsly v. Chicago & North W. Transp. Co., 850 F.2d 1255 (8th Cir. 1988). “14 With only a few exceptions, it subjects disputes concerning these various topics to resolution under section 714, 45 U.S.C. § 797m, which provides for arbitration by an adjustment board under section 3 of the Railway Labor Act, 45 U.”

Beardsly v. Chicago & North W. Transp. Co., 836 F.2d 1493 (8th Cir. 1988). “14 With only a few exceptions, it subjects disputes concerning these various topics to resolution under § 714, 45 U.S.C. § 797m, which provides for arbitration by an adjustment board under § 3 of the Railway Labor Act, 45 U.”

Consol. Rail Corp. v. Am. Train Dispatchers Ass'n, 716 F.2d 198 (3rd Cir. 1983). “See 45 U.S.C. § 797m (Supp.V 1981). The correct interpretation of section 507 is important only to the declining number of pre-1981 grievances still governed by former title V.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.