46 U.S.C. § 103
Boundary Line
In this title, the term “Boundary Line” means a line established under section 2(b) of the Act of February 19, 1895 (33 U.S.C. 151(b)).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 12
cases, 1930–1983 · leading case: United States v. Michael Joseph Arra, Steven Scott Aschinger, & Overton Baker Pettit, 630 F.2d 836 (1st Cir. 1980).
United States v. Michael Joseph Arra, Steven Scott Aschinger, & Overton Baker Pettit, 630 F.2d 836 (1st Cir. 1980). “, 46 U.S.C. § 103 , preventing pleasure yachts from carrying cargo or passengers for hire.”
United States v. John Thompson, Steven Barfield, & Kim Williams, 710 F.2d 1500 (11th Cir. 1983). “The authority presently vested in the Coast Guard under section 89(a) can be traced to an enactment of the First Congress, the same Congress which proposed the fourth amendment.”
Olson v. United States, 68 F.2d 8 (2d Cir. 1933). “” Section 103 of title 46 United States Code (46 USCA § 103), which provides for the licensing of pleasure yachts, provides that such vessel shall not be allowed to transport merchandise or carry passengers for hire.”
Finkel v. Challenger Marine Corp., 316 F. Supp. 549 (S.D. Fla. 1970). “At the time contemplated by the charters, plaintiff’s vessel was licensed by the Bureau of Customs (as a private pleasure yacht pursuant to Title 46 U.S.C. § 103 ) and was thereby prohibited from transporting or carrying passengers for hire.”
United States v. Whitmore, 536 F. Supp. 1284 (D. Me. 1982). “The fact that the Relentless appeared to be a pleasure craft forbidden from carrying cargo or passengers for hire, see 46 U.S.C. § 103 , and that it was riding low in the water, together with the fact that the Relentless appeared to be a vessel required by federal law to carry a…”
Jackman v. United States, 56 F.2d 358 (1st Cir. 1932). “…§ 325), by reason of a violation of sections 4214, 4218, 4320, and 4377 of the Revised Statutes of the United States (46 USCA §§ 103, 106, 262, 325), title 2, § 3 of the National Prohibition Act (27 USCA § 12), title 1, § 1, Schedule 8, paragraphs 802 and 814, and title 4, §§…”
Gaul v. United States, 62 F.2d 559 (1st Cir. 1933). “district as forfeited for violation of section 4214 of the Revised Statutes, as amended ( 46 U. S. C. § 103 [46 USCA § 103]) and of section 4377 of the Revised Statutes (46 U.”
The Daisy T., 48 F.2d 370 (D. Del. 1931). “(46 USCA § 103); fourth, that, being duly licensed as a pleasure vessel, under twenty tons, such license containing a clause that she should not transport merchandise or carry passengers for pay or engage in any unlawful trade, or in any way violate the revenue laws of the…”
The Marge, 48 F.2d 649 (D. Mass. 1931). “This is a petition for the forfeiture of the speed boat Marge, which the government alleges has become liable to forfeiture under 46 USCA § 103 (Rev. St. § 4214, as amended) and 46 USCA § 325 (Rev.”
The Antigostine, 44 F.2d 170 (E.D.N.Y 1930). “The petition shows that the Hitchcock Gas Engine Company furnished certain supplies to the vessel between the 25th day of January, 1930, and the 28th day of June, 1930, on which there is an unpaid balance; that on August 27, 1930, the libel herein was filed for violation of…”
The Don, 4 F. Supp. 809 (D. Del. 1933). “(46 USCA §§ 103, 325), and section 3, title 2 of the National Prohibition Act (27 USCA § 12).”
The Felicia, 13 F. Supp. 959 (E.D.N.Y 1936). “§§ 325 and 103, 46 U.S.C.A. §§ 103 , 325). No testimony was offered by the claimant Thompson, who was the yacht’s captain, with the result that the evidence of the government stands uncontradicted.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.