Notes of Decisions
Kaluom v. Stolt Offshore, Inc., 504 F.3d 511 (5th Cir. 2007).
· cites it 20× “We agree with the district court that the voyage requirements set out in 46 U.S.C. §§ 10301 and 10501 apply to those foreign vessels encompassed by penalty wage statutes 46 U.”
George v. Kramo Ltd., 796 F. Supp. 1541 (E.D. La. 1992).
· cites it 5× “7 Regardless, I find that such a stop does not convert a voyage between two ports in the United States into a voyage between a port in the United States and a port in a foreign country, within the meaning of 46 U.S.C. § 10301 . In fact, had the vessel transited the Canal before,…”
Frederick v. Kirby Tankships, Inc., 205 F.3d 1277 (11th Cir. 2000).
“See 46 U.S.C. §§ 10301 (a), 10501(a). The Champion traveled from Mississippi to Connecticut — a coastwise voyage.”
Pac. Merch. Shipping Ass'n v. Aubry, 918 F.2d 1409 (9th Cir. 1990).
· cites it 2× “See 46 U.S.C. § 10301 (a)(1). “Intercoastal voyages” are voyages between ports on the Atlantic and Pacific coasts.”
Doyle v. Huntress, Inc., 301 F. Supp. 2d 135 (D.R.I. 2004).
“, 46 U.S.C. § 10301 (1996)(excluding vessels “on which the seamen are entitled by custom or agreement to share in the profit or result of a voyage”); 46 U.”
Pac. Merch. Shipping Ass'n v. Aubry, 709 F. Supp. 1516 (C.D. Cal. 1989).
· cites it 2× “46 U.S.C. § 10301 (a)(1). Inter-coastal voyages consist of voyages between ports on the Atlantic and Pacific coasts.”
Cruz v. Chesapeake Shipping Inc., 738 F. Supp. 809 (D. Del. 1990).
· cites it 2× “Also enlightening is the *823 fact that Congress extended provisions concerning “Seamen Protection and Relief” to three types of voyages: between a port in the United States and a foreign port, see 46 U.S.C. § 10301 (a)(1); between an American port in the Atlantic Ocean and an…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.