46 U.S.C. § 30701
Definition
In this chapter, the term “carrier” means the owner, manager, charterer, agent, or master of a vessel.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 172
cases (44 in the last 5 years), 2007–2026 · leading case: Dimond Rigging Co. v. BDP Int'l, Inc., 914 F.3d 435 (6th Cir. 2019).
Dimond Rigging Co. v. BDP Int'l, Inc., 914 F.3d 435 (6th Cir. 2019). “6 See 46 U.S.C. § 30701 (Notes § 3(6) ). The Equipment arrived in China on March 21, 2012 and was released to Dimond's customer on May 17, 2012.”
Royal Ins. v. Orient Overseas Container Line Ltd., 525 F.3d 409 (6th Cir. 2008). “On September 29, 2005, the district court granted partial summary judgment for OOCL and Third-Party Appellees, ruling that Appellants’ claims were subject to the $500-per-package liability limitation prescribed by the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act (“COGSA”), 46 U.S.C. § 30701 et…”
Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd. v. Regal-Beloit Corp., 561 U.S. 89 (2010). “In that case the terms of a through bill were controlled by federal maritime law and by a federal statute known as the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act (COGSA), note following 46 U. S. C. §30701 . Kirby held that bill of lading provisions permissi ble under COGSA can be invoked by a…”
Greenpack of Puerto Rico, Inc. v. Am. President Lines, 684 F.3d 20 (1st Cir. 2012). “1207 (1936), reprinted in 46 U.S.C. § 30701 note (2006) (previously codified at 46 U.”
In Re: M/V MSC Flaminia, 72 F.4th 430 (2d Cir. 2023). “We REVERSE the district court’s determination that Deltech and Stolt are strictly liable under Section 4(6) of the Carriage of Goods at Sea Act (“COGSA”), 46 U.S.C. § 30701 (note), but we AFFIRM its ruling that Deltech and Stolt are liable under a failure-to-warn theory pursuant…”
Regal-Beloit Corp. v. Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd., 557 F.3d 985 (9th Cir. 2009). “” 46 U.S.C. § 30701 Notes Sec. 1(e). COGSA does, however, explicitly authorize sea carriers and shippers to extend its rules contractually to cover inland transportation or transportation between two American ports.”
Lindo v. NCL (Bahamas), Ltd., 652 F.3d 1257 (11th Cir. 2011). “[7] COGSA, now codified as amended in the note following 46 U.S.C. § 30701 , "governs the terms of bills of lading issued by ocean carriers engaged in foreign trade.”
Petroleos Mexicanos Refinacion v. M/T King a (Ex-Tbilisi), 554 F.3d 99 (3rd Cir. 2009). “(6) [L]imitation of actions In any event the carrier and the ship shall be discharged from all liability in respect of loss or damage unless suit is brought within one year after delivery of *104 the goods or the date when the goods should have been delivered.”
Fed. Ins. Co. v. Union Pac. R.R. Co., 651 F.3d 1175 (9th Cir. 2011). “4 The paramount clause made the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act (COGSA), 46 U.S.C. § 30701 note, applicable “[f]rom loading of the Goods onto the Vessel until discharge of the Goods from the Vessel,” and the Hague Rules applicable “[p]rior to loading onto the Vessel and after…”
In Re M/V Rickmers Genoa Litig., 622 F. Supp. 2d 56 (S.D.N.Y. 2009). “” See 46 U.S.C. § 30701 note § 1. The Court of Appeals has tended to interpret COGSA according to its plain meaning.”
MAN Ferrostaal, Inc. v. M/V Akili, 704 F.3d 77 (2d Cir. 2012). “” The Hague-Visby rules are an international convention that are in all pertinent respects literally identical to rules established by the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act, 46 U.S.C. § 30701 (“COGSA” or “the Act”).”
Crompton Greaves, Ltd. v. Shippers Stevedoring Co., 776 F. Supp. 2d 375 (S.D. Tex. 2011). “1207 (1936), reprinted in note following 46 U.S.C. § 30701 ; Kirby, 543 U.S. at 29, 125 S.”
— 46 U.S.C. § 30701(5) — 1 case
Royal & Sun All. Ins. PLC v. Ocean World Lines, Inc., 572 F. Supp. 2d 379 (S.D.N.Y. 2008).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.