U.S. Code » Title 46 » Subtitle Subtitle III— Maritime Liability › Chapter CHAPTER 307— LIABILITY OF WATER CARRIERS

46 U.S.C. § 30706

Defenses

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 46 CasesGoogle Scholar
(a)Due Diligence.—If a carrier has exercised due diligence to make the vessel in all respects seaworthy and to properly man, equip, and supply the vessel, the carrier and the vessel are not liable for loss or damage arising from an error in the navigation or management of the vessel.(b)Other Defenses.—A carrier and the vessel are not liable for loss or damage arising from—(1) dangers of the sea or other navigable waters;(2) acts of God;(3) public enemies;(4) seizure under legal process;(5) inherent defect, quality, or vice of the goods;(6) insufficiency of package;(7) act or omission of the shipper or owner of the goods or their agent; or(8) saving or attempting to save life or property at sea, including a deviation in rendering such a service.(Pub. L. 109–304, § 6(c), Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1517.)

Historical and Revision Notes

Revised

Section

Source (U.S. Code)

Source (Statutes at Large)

30706

46 App.:192.

Feb. 13, 1893, ch. 105, § 3, 27 Stat. 445.

This section is restated as two subsections to clarify that the exercise of due diligence in making the vessel seaworthy is a condition only to the defense of error in navigation or management restated in subsection (a). See May v. Hamburg-Amerikanische Packetfahrt Aktiengesellschaft (The Isis), 290 U.S. 333, 353 (1933). The words “transporting merchandise or property to or from any port in the United States of America” are omitted because of section 30702(a) of the revised title.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2008–2021 · leading case: Amazon Produce Network, LLC v. M/V LYKES OSPREY, 553 F. Supp. 2d 502 (E.D. Pa. 2008).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Amazon Produce Network, LLC v. M/V LYKES OSPREY, 553 F. Supp. 2d 502 (E.D. Pa. 2008). · cites it 2× “If the plaintiff succeeds in making out a prima facie case, the burden shifts to the carrier to prove that the damage was caused not by its own negligence, but by one of a number of exceptions enumerated in the statute.”
In Re S. Scrap Material Co., LLC, 713 F. Supp. 2d 568 (E.D. La. 2010). “, Carriage of Goods by Sea Act, 46 U.S.C. § 30706 (b)(2); the Oil Pollution Act, 33 U.”
Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. Maersk Line (S.D.N.Y. 2021). “20), but the record contains no evidence of the weather conditions during the cargo’s ocean voyage.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.