47 U.S.C. § 35

Withholding or revoking of licenses by President; terms and conditions of licenses

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 47 CasesGoogle Scholar

The President may withhold or revoke such license when he shall be satisfied after due notice and hearing that such action will assist in securing rights for the landing or operation of cables in foreign countries, or in maintaining the rights or interests of the United States or of its citizens in foreign countries, or will promote the security of the United States, or may grant such license upon such terms as shall be necessary to assure just and reasonable rates and service in the operation and use of cables so licensed. The license shall not contain terms or conditions granting to the licensee exclusive rights of landing or of operation in the United States. Nothing herein contained shall be construed to limit the power and jurisdiction of the Federal Communications Commission with respect to the transmission of messages.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 5 cases, 1940–1984 · leading case: O'Brien v. W. Union Tel. Co., 113 F.2d 539 (1st Cir. 1940).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

O'Brien v. W. Union Tel. Co., 113 F.2d 539 (1st Cir. 1940). “1064 , 47 U.S.C.A. §§ 35 , 151 et seq., and to regulations thereunder by the Federal Communications Commission.”

Lesesne v. Willingham, 83 F. Supp. 918 (E.D.S.C. 1949). “1064 , 47 U.S.C.A. §§ 35 , 151 et seq., and the regulations thereunder by the Federal Communications Commission.”

Alston Coal Co. v. Fed. Power Comm'n, 137 F.2d 740 (10th Cir. 1943). “1064 , 47 U.S.C.A. §§ 35 , 151 et seq. The provisions of that Act are materially different from those of the Act we have for consideration here.”

Jacobs v. Reading Co., 130 F.2d 612 (3rd Cir. 1942). “1084 , 47 U.S.C.A. §§ 35 , 151 et seq. Stott v. Thompson, 294 Ill.”

Alascom, Inc. v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, 727 F.2d 1212 (D.C. Cir. 1984). “47 U.S.C. §§ 35 , 151-609 (1976 & Supp. V 1981).”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.