Notes of Decisions
Arista Records LLC v. John Does 1-19, 551 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D.D.C. 2008).
· cites it 7× “Finally, the Court’s Memorandum Opinion stated that it was ordering disclosure of the information pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 551 (c)(2)(B), which authorizes cable operators to disclose personally identifiable information when cable operators are ordered to do so by a court.”
Fitch v. John or Jane Doe 1, 2005 ME 39, 869 A.2d 722.
· cites it 18× “Doe contends that (1) the court improperly concluded that Doe consented to disclosure; (2) the disclosure is forbidden by the Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984, 47 U.S.C.A. § 551 (West 2001 & Supp.2004); and (3) the First Amendment requires an additional determination…”
Carpenter v. United States, 585 U.S. 296 (2018).
· cites it 2× “§552b(f )(2) (“Copies of such transcript, or minutes, or a tran- scription of such recording disclosing the identity of each speaker, shall be furnished to any person at the actual cost of duplication or transcrip- tion”); Cable Act, 47 U. S. C. §551 (d) (“A cable subscriber…”
Parker v. Time Warner Ent. Co., LP, 631 F. Supp. 2d 242 (E.D.N.Y. 2009).
· cites it 12× “The Complaint alleges, inter alia, that the defendant violated certain provisions of the Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984, 47 U.S.C. § 551 et seq. (the “Cable Act”).”
Marx v. Gen. Revenue Corp., 568 U.S. 371 (2013).
· cites it 2× “a reasonable attorney’s fee and costs”); 47 U. S. C. §551 (f)(2) (“[T]he court may award .”
Manny Film LLC v. Doe Subscriber Assigned IP Address 50.166.88.98, 98 F. Supp. 3d 693 (D.N.J. 2015).
· cites it 2× “Under 47 U.S.C. § 551 (c)(2)(B), such personally identifiable information is discoverable from a cable provider if "made pursuant to a court order authorizing such disclosure, if the subscriber is notified of such order by the person to whom the order is directed[.”
In re Does 1-10, 242 S.W.3d 805 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2007).
· cites it 5× “” 2 Procedurally, the Hospital filed a petition against the Does — combined with an “ex parte request to non-party to disclose information” directed at SuddenLink, explicitly based on 47 U.S.C.A. § 551 (c) (West 2001 & Supp.2007), asking the trial court to direct SuddenLink to…”
Braitberg v. Charter Commc'ns, Inc., 836 F.3d 925 (8th Cir. 2016).
· cites it 2× “, alleging that Charter retained his personally identifiable information in violation of a section of the Cable Communications Policy Act, 47 U.S.C. § 551 (e). Charter filed a motion to dismiss for lack of Article III standing and failure *927 to state a claim.”
Comcast Cable Commc'ns, LLC v. Hourani, 190 F. Supp. 3d 29 (D.D.C. 2016).
· cites it 5× “Under the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 551 (c), Comcast may only disclose the information sought if so ordered by a U.”
Rotten Records, Inc. v. Doe, 107 F. Supp. 3d 257 (W.D.N.Y. 2015).
· cites it 2× “§ 522 (5), are effectively prohibited by 47 U.S.C. § 551 (c) from disclosing the identities of [the defendant] to Plaintiff.”
Rotten Records, Inc. v. Doe, 108 F. Supp. 3d 132 (W.D.N.Y. 2015).
· cites it 2× “§ 522 (5), are effectively prohibited by 47 U.S.C. § 551 (c) from disclosing the identities of [the defendant] to Plaintiff.”
Jeffrey Klimas v. Comcast Cable Commc'ns, Inc., 465 F.3d 271 (6th Cir. 2006).
· cites it 10× “” 47 U.S.C.A. § 551 (b),(b)(1). Section 551(a) is broader, requiring notice of the collection of “personally identifiable information” to subscribers of “any cable service or other service, ” 47 U.”
47 U.S.C. § 551(c): 2 cases
47 U.S.C. § 551(c)(1): 1 case
47 U.S.C. § 551(c)(2)(B): 3 cases
47 U.S.C. § 551(h): 1 case
Fitch v. John or Jane Doe 1, 2005 ME 39, 869 A.2d 722.
“Doe contends that (1) the court improperly concluded that Doe consented to disclosure; (2) the disclosure is forbidden by the Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984, 47 U.S.C.A. § 551 (West 2001 & Supp.2004); and (3) the First Amendment requires an additional determination…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.