48 U.S.C. § 1493
Prosecution; authorization to seek review; local or Federal appellate courts; decisions, judgments or orders
Section effective on ninetieth day following
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 16
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1987–2021 · leading case: Gov't of the Virgin Islands v. Jamel Rivera, 333 F.3d 143 (3rd Cir. 2003).
Gov't of the Virgin Islands v. Jamel Rivera, 333 F.3d 143 (3rd Cir. 2003). “Here, the Government of the Virgin Islands asserts that its authority to appeal is supplied by 48 U.S.C. § 1493 (c). The statute provides, “The prosecution in a territory .”
Gov't of the Virgin Islands v. Paul Mills, Gov't of the Virgin Islands v. Lynn Smith, 935 F.2d 591 (3rd Cir. 1991). “The version of Section 3731 in effect since 1984, when viewed by itself, clearly appears to provide jurisdiction for the present appeals.”
Gov't of the Virgin Islands v. Fonseca, 274 F.3d 760 (3rd Cir. 2001). “They note that 48 U.S.C. § 1493 — authorizing appeals from prosecutions in a territory — does not authorize the government to appeal a grant of a new trial in a criminal case.”
Gov't of the Virgin Islands v. Jareem Fahie, 419 F.3d 249 (3rd Cir. 2005). “Jurisdiction and Standard of Review The District Court had jurisdiction over the Government’s appeal pursuant to 48 U.S.C. § 1493 . We exercise jurisdiction over this appeal under 28 U.”
The People of the Territory of Guam v. Amelita T. Estrebor, 848 F.2d 1014 (9th Cir. 1988). “48 U.S.C.A. § 1493 (c) (Supp.1987), enacted after Okada , authorizes the prosecution in a territory to seek review of an adverse decision of an appellate court, and 48 U.”
Gov't of the Virgin Islands v. Zacchaeas Blake Leon Nisbett, 118 F.3d 972 (3rd Cir. 1997). “6 For this reason we also reject the government's argument that an appeal lies under 48 U.S.C. § 1493 (a). Nor was an appeal available under subsection (b) because the order of trial court was made "after the defendant had been put in jeopardy.”
Gov't of Virgin Islands v. Briggs, 155 F. Supp. 2d 455 (D.V.I. 2001). “In its opposition to the appellee’s motion to dismiss, the government cites 48 U.S.C. § 1493 as giving it the authority to appeal in this instance.”
People of the Territory of Guam v. Frankie Agualo Ulloa, 903 F.2d 1283 (9th Cir. 1990). “20 have been preempted by 48 U.S.C. § 1493 . 6 The government of Guam concedes that § 1493 does not authorize it to appeal in this case, but contends that § 1493 does not operate to preempt any portion of § 130.”
People of Guam v. Gerald Wayne Cruz II aka Gerard Wayne Cruz II, 2021 Guam 10 (Guam 2021). “Following dismissal of the Animal Cruelty offenses, the People timely appealed.”
Gov't of the Virgin Islands v. Douglas, 812 F.2d 822 (3rd Cir. 1987). “48 U.S.C. § 1493 (Supp. II 1984). . Other circuits have concluded that sentencing orders are appealable by the government pursuant to § 3731.”
Govt of VI v. Rivera (3rd Cir. 2003). “Here, the Government of the Virgin Islands asserts that its authority to appeal is supplied by 48 U.S.C. § 1493 (c). The statute provides, “The prosecution in a territory .”
Territory of Guam v. Borja, 983 F.2d 914 (9th Cir. 1992). “Therefore the Appellate Division’s decisions are final and appealable, and this court has jurisdiction.”
— 48 U.S.C. § 1493(b) — 2 cases
Gov't of the Virgin Islands v. Zacchaeas Blake Leon Nisbett, 118 F.3d 972 (3rd Cir. 1997). “6 For this reason we also reject the government's argument that an appeal lies under 48 U.S.C. § 1493 (a). Nor was an appeal available under subsection (b) because the order of trial court was made "after the defendant had been put in jeopardy.”
Govt of V.I. v. Blake (3rd Cir. 1997).
— 48 U.S.C. § 1493(c) — 2 cases
Gov't of the Virgin Islands v. Jamel Rivera, 333 F.3d 143 (3rd Cir. 2003). “Here, the Government of the Virgin Islands asserts that its authority to appeal is supplied by 48 U.S.C. § 1493 (c). The statute provides, “The prosecution in a territory .”
Govt of VI v. Rivera (3rd Cir. 2003). “Here, the Government of the Virgin Islands asserts that its authority to appeal is supplied by 48 U.S.C. § 1493 (c). The statute provides, “The prosecution in a territory .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.