48 U.S.C. § 261 to 291
Repealed. Apr. 13, 1934, ch. 119, § 1, 48 Stat. 583
48 U.S.C. § 261 has no page of its own: the Office of the Law Revision Counsel prints it together with other sections as the single entry 48 U.S.C. § 261 to 291, shown below.
[repealed]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 13
cases, 1919–1930 · leading case: Abbate v. United States, 270 F. 735 (9th Cir. 1921).
Abbate v. United States, 270 F. 735 (9th Cir. 1921). “53 [ 48 U.S.C.A. § 261 et seq.]), in that he willfully and unlawfully had in his possession for sale intoxicating liquor, and he was sentenced to pay a fine of $800 and to be imprisoned three months in jail.”
Tynan v. United States, 297 F. 177 (9th Cir. 1924). “903 [ 48 U.S.C.A. § 261 et seq.]). The assignments of error are directed against the jury as impaneled, against the information, and against testimony obtained through an unlawful search and seizure.”
Hauptman v. United States, 43 F.2d 86 (9th Cir. 1930). “903 [ 48 U.S.C.A. § 261 et seq,]). They appeal from the judgment and assign on the appeal certain alleged errors occurring at the trial.”
Miller v. United States, 4 F.2d 384 (9th Cir. 1925). “53, approved February 14, 1917 ( 48 U.S.C.A. § 261 et seq.). Error is assigned to a ruling of the court admitting certain testimony of a prohibition agent, who, after testifying that he and one Kinnard, another prohibition officer, while making an investigation, met and talked…”
Peterson v. United States, 297 F. 1002 (9th Cir. 1924). “903 ( 48 U.S.C.A. § 261 et seq.). Upon appeal to the District Court he was convicted and sentenced to one year in jail in Alaska and to pay a fine of $1,000, and in default of the payment of the fine, to serve a term in the designated jail not to exceed one day for each $2 of…”
Koppitz v. United States, 272 F. 96 (9th Cir. 1921). “The conditions of the bond recite that whereas, Koppitz was on June 2, 1920, before the commissioner for the Cordova precinct, Alaska, duly convicted of the crime of violating the Alaska Bone Dry Law ( 48 U.S.C.A. § 261 et seq.), “by being drunk in the public streets in…”
N. Com. Co. v. Brenneman, 259 F. 514 (9th Cir. 1919). “53 [ 48 U.S.C.A. § 261 et seq.]), under the title “An act to prohibit the manufacture or sale of alcoholic liquors in the territory of Alaska, and for other purposes.”
Simpson v. United States, 290 F. 963 (9th Cir. 1923). “903 [ 48 U.S.C.A. § 261 et seq.]). A demurrer to the complaint or information was overruled, and after the jury was impaneled the defendant objected to further proceedings or to the introduction of any testimony in the case for the following reasons: First, because the complaint…”
Peterson v. United States, 297 F. 1000 (9th Cir. 1924). “53 [ 48 U.S.C.A. § 261 ]). Peterson was sentenced to nine months in jail and to pay a fine of $900, and upon appeal to the District Court of the Territory of Alaska, he was again convicted.”
Baker v. United States, 4 F.2d 805 (9th Cir. 1925). “903 ( 48 U.S.C.A. § 261 et seq.). Plaintiff in error contends that the search warrant is defective in not sufficiently describing the premises to be searched.”
United States v. Berkeness, 16 F.2d 115 (9th Cir. 1926). “This appeal, taken by the United States, presents the question as to whether a search warrant may be issued under the provisions of the Bone Dry Act ( 48 U.S.C.A. § 261 et seq.), affecting only Alaska Territory, where the place to be searched is used as a dwelling, without a…”
United States v. Richards, 22 F.2d 998 (D. Mass. 1927). “903 , approved February 14, 1917 [48 USCA § 261 et seq.; Comp. St. § 3643b et seq.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.