48 U.S.C. § 411

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 48 CasesGoogle Scholar

“This Compact shall come into effect upon mutual agreement between the Government of the United States, acting in fulfillment of its responsibilities as Administering Authority of the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands, and the Government of Palau, subsequent to completion of the following:“(a) Approval by the Government of Palau in accordance with its constitutional processes;“(b) Approval by the people of Palau in a referendum called on this Compact; and“(c) Approval by the Government of the United States in accordance with its constitutional processes.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 8 cases, 1908–1952 · leading case: Hynes, Reg'l Dir., Fish & Wildlife Serv. v. Grimes Packing Co., 337 U.S. 86 (1949).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Hynes, Reg'l Dir., Fish & Wildlife Serv. v. Grimes Packing Co., 337 U.S. 86 (1949). “409 , 48 U.S.C. § 411 , "Extending the homestead laws and providing for right of way for railroads in the District of Alaska, and for other purposes," there is the express proviso that nothing contained in the Act "shall be construed as impairing in any degree the title of any…”

Dalton v. Hazelet, 182 F. 561 (9th Cir. 1910). “” The right of access by means of a wharf or other structure is also subject to the last proviso in section 2 of the *538 act of May 14, 1898 ( 48 U.S.C.A. § 411 ): “That nothing in this act contained shall be construed as impairing in any degree the title of any state that may…”

Columbia Canning Co. v. Hampton, 161 F. 60 (9th Cir. 1908). “409 ( 48 U.S.C.A. §§ 411 et seq., 561 et seq.), “extending the homestead laws and providing for right of way of railroads in the District of Alaska, and for other purposes,” provided specifically in section 1 that nothing therein contained should “be so construed as to authorize…”

United States v. Libby, McNeil & Libby, 107 F. Supp. 697 (D. Alaska 1952). “409 , 48 U.S.C.A. § 411 , declaring that the navigable waters and tide lands of Alaska shall be held in trust for the future state.”

Grimes Packing Co. v. Hynes, 67 F. Supp. 43 (D. Alaska 1946). “409, 48 U.S.C.A. § 411 , Sec. 186, C.L.A. 33, Congress definitely expressed its policy toward Alaska with reference to tide waters: “ * * * That nothing in this act * * * contained shall be construed as impairing in any degree the title of any State that may hereafter be erected…”

United States v. Lynch, 8 Alaska 135 (D. Alaska 1929). · cites it 3× “1575 [48U.S.C.A. § 411]). * * * “No person can acquire a vested right in such lands as the law now stands.”

United States v. Libby, McNeill & Libby, 98 F. Supp. 601 (D. Alaska 1951). “6737 , particularly in that no notice was given or hearing held and no opportunity afforded the defendant and others adversely affected by the order to file protests and to be heard thereon; (b) it includes tide lands or navigable waters, in contravention of the Act of May 14,…”

Washington Trust Co. v. Dunaway, 169 F. 37 (9th Cir. 1909). “The terms *310 of the grant contained in section 2 ( 48 U.S.C.A. § 411 ) are in prsesenti, and by section 4 ( 48 U.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.