49 U.S.C. § 104
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 19
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1984–2026 · leading case: City of Cleveland v. Ohio, 508 F.3d 827 (6th Cir. 2007).
City of Cleveland v. Ohio, 508 F.3d 827 (6th Cir. 2007). “, and administered by the FHWA, 49 U.S.C. § 104 ; 49 C.F.R. § 1.48 (b). The FHWA is an agency within the United States Department of Transportation.”
Trkr United Sfty v. Mead, Kenneth M., 251 F.3d 183 (D.C. Cir. 2001). “See 49 U.S.C. § 104 ; 49 C.F.R. §§ 350.1-399.”
John P. Clark v. Samuel K. Skinner, Sec'y of Transp., 937 F.2d 123 (4th Cir. 1991). “49 U.S.C. § 104 . 2 . 49 C.F.R. § 391.49 (d)(3)(i)(B) provides: (i) The medical evaluation summary for a driver applicant disqualified under § 391.”
Truckers United for Saf. v. Mead, 86 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D.D.C. 2000). “Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. § 104 (1994), motor carriers are regulated by the Federal Highway Administration (“FHWA”) of the U.”
Radio Ass'n on Defending Airwave Rights, Inc. Frank Figuero v. United States Dep't of Transp., Fed. High. Admin., 47 F.3d 794 (6th Cir. 1995). “49 U.S.C. § 104 (c)(2); 49 C.F.R. 1.48(f), (aa).”
Bell BCI Co. v. United States, 56 Fed. Cl. 465 (Fed. Cl. 2003). “, 49 U.S.C. § 104 , establishing the Federal Highway Administration.”
Owner-Operators Indep. Drivers Ass'n of Am., Inc. v. Skinner, 931 F.2d 582 (9th Cir. 1991). “The FHWA promulgated the regulations pursuant to its authority under 49 U.S.C. §§ 104 , 3102 and 49 U.S.C. app.”
Moore v. United States Dep't of Transp., 3 F. App'x 508 (7th Cir. 2001). “In July 1998 Moore initiated this action by filing what he characterized as a “complaint” in district court against the United States Department of Transportation, the FHWA (an operating administration within the DOT, see 49 U.S.C. § 104 ), and the Office of Motor Carriers (an…”
Int'l Bhd. of Teamsters v. Peña, 17 F.3d 1478 (D.C. Cir. 1994). “Accordingly, when the Secretary exercises the § 3102(b) authority (or when the FHWA does so on the Secretary’s behalf, see 49 U.S.C. § 104 (c)(2); 49 *1482 CFR § 1.”
Friedrich v. U.S. Comput. Servs., 974 F.2d 409 (3rd Cir. 1992). “49 U.S.C. §§ 104 (a), (c). . Where Congress reenacts a statute without substantive change, it generally is presumed to be aware of any administrative or judicial interpretations and to adopt those interpretations by reenactment.”
Lindsey v. Navistar Int'l Transp. Corp., 150 F.3d 1307 (11th Cir. 1998). “See 49 U.S.C. §§ 104 & 31502(b). Standards issued by NHTSA and BMCS apply to “all employers, employees, and commercial motor vehicles, which transport property or passengers in interstate commerce.”
Kristina L. Ives, Individually v. Hmb Prof'l Engineers, Inc. (Ky. Ct. App. 2024). “See 49 U.S.C. § 104 ,17 23 U.S.C. § 17 49 U.S.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.