U.S. Code » Title 49 » Subtitle SUBTITLE VII— AVIATION PROGRAMS › Part PART A— AIR COMMERCE AND SAFETY › Subpart subpart i— general › Chapter CHAPTER 401— GENERAL PROVISIONS

49 U.S.C. § 105

CONTINUATION OF CERTAIN AIR SERVICE.

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 49 CasesGoogle Scholar
“(a)Action of Secretary.—The Secretary of Transportation should take appropriate action to ensure that all communities that had scheduled air service before September 11, 2001, continue to receive adequate air transportation service and that essential air service to small communities continues without interruption.“(b)Essential Air Service.—There is authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary to carry out the essential air service program under subchapter II of chapter 417 of title 49, United States Code, $120,000,000 for fiscal year 2002.“(c)Secretarial Oversight.—“(1)In general.—Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary is authorized to require an air carrier receiving direct financial assistance under this Act to maintain scheduled air service to any point served by that carrier before September 11, 2001.“(2)Agreements.—In applying paragraph (1), the Secretary may require air carriers receiving direct financial assistance under this Act to enter into agreements which will ensure, to the maximum extent practicable, that all communities that had scheduled air service before September 11, 2001, continue to receive adequate air transportation service.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1980–2023 · leading case: Thunderbird Motor Freight Lines, Inc. v. Penn-Dixie Steel Corp. (In Re Penn-Dixie Steel Corp.), 6 B.R. 817 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 1980).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Thunderbird Motor Freight Lines, Inc. v. Penn-Dixie Steel Corp. (In Re Penn-Dixie Steel Corp.), 6 B.R. 817 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 1980). · cites it 2× “Ill Carrier’s Lien Under the ICA Thunderbird claims to have a statutory lien on freight delivered to Penn-Dixie as consignee by virtue of Section 25 of the Federal Uniform Bills of Lading Act, 49 U.S.C. § 105 . This provision, in pertinent part, provides: If an order bill is…”
S. Pac. Transp. Co. v. Com. Metals Co., 456 U.S. 336 (1982). “Furthermore, it is by no means clear that SP could safely have deferred delivery of the second and third cars until after Careo had paid the charges on the first car.”
Patricia M. Wood v. Gen. Motors Corp., 865 F.2d 395 (1st Cir. 1988). “The current delegation to NHTSA is found at 49 U.S.C. § 105 , 49 C.F.R. § 501.2 (a) (1987).”
Emma Taylor v. Gen. Motors Corp., 875 F.2d 816 (11th Cir. 1989). “1713 , 1739 (codified at 49 U.S.C. § 105 (1982)). *823 The safety standard here at issue, Standard 208, was first adopted in 1967.”
Ford Motor Co. v. Ammerman, 705 N.E.2d 539 (Ind. Ct. App. 1999). “49 U.S.C.A. § 105 . Its jurisdiction includes "prescibpng] motor vehicle safety standards for motor vehicles and motor vehicle equipment in interstate commerce; and [ ] carrying] out needed safety research and development.”
In Re Bridgestone/Firestone Inc., Tires Prods. Liab. Litig., 153 F. Supp. 2d 935 (S.D. Ind. 2001). “See 49 U.S.C. § 105 (d) ("The Secretary may carry out chapter 301 of this title through the Administrator [of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration].”
Ctr. for Auto Saf. v. Elizabeth H. Dole, Sec'y, Dep't of Transp., 828 F.2d 799 (D.C. Cir. 1987). “The statute itself refers not to the Administrator but to the Secretary of Transportation, who is one of the appellees in this case. See, e.g., 15 U.”
Cellucci v. Gen. Motors Corp., 676 A.2d 253 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1996). “and 49 U.S.C. § 105 . See also 49 C.F.R. Part 571.”
Intellistop Inc. v. DOT, 72 F.4th 344 (D.C. Cir. 2023). “See 49 U.S.C. §§ 105 (d), 30102(a)(7), 30111(a).”
City of Monroe Employees Ret. Sys. v. Bridgestone Corp., 399 F.3d 651 (6th Cir. 2005). “See generally 49 U.S.C. § 105 . 4 . The Complaint does not address the years 1980 — 1987.”
Ford Motor Co. v. Ammerman (Ind. 1998). “49 U.S.C.A. § 105 . Its jurisdiction includes "prescib[ing] motor vehicle safety standards for motor vehicles and motor vehicle equipment in interstate commerce; and [] carry[ing] out needed safety research and development.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.