49 U.S.C. § 10910
Effect on other statutes and authorities
Nothing in section 10908 or 10909 is intended to affect the traditional police powers of the State to require a rail carrier to comply with State and local environmental, public health, and public safety standards that are not unreasonably burdensome to interstate commerce and do not discriminate against rail carriers.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 17
cases, 1982–2019 · leading case: Jack O. Black v. Interstate Com. Comm'n & United States of Am., 762 F.2d 106 (D.C. Cir. 1985).
Jack O. Black v. Interstate Com. Comm'n & United States of Am., 762 F.2d 106 (D.C. Cir. 1985). “IHR’s authority to acquire the Connersville line was granted by the Commission on November 16, 1981, under 49 U.S.C. § 10910 (1982), the Staggers Rail Act “feeder line” development program.”
Cheney R.R. Co., Inc. v. R.R. Ret. Bd., Tyson R.R., Inc. v. R.R. Ret. Bd., 50 F.3d 1071 (D.C. Cir. 1995). “In 1989, the Interstate Commerce Commission, acting pursuant to § 401 of the Staggers Rail Act, 49 U.S.C. § 10910 (1988), authorized Cheney Railroad Company, Inc.”
Hi Tech Trans, LLC David Stoller v. State of New Jersey, Dep't of Env't Prot. Wolfgang Skacel, C.H.M.M. Bradley M. Campbell., 382 F.3d 295 (3rd Cir. 2004). “See 49 U.S.C. § 10910 . This record establishes that Hi Tech has never received such formal certification from the STB.”
Simmons v. Interstate Com. Comm'n, 697 F.2d 326 (D.C. Cir. 1982). “More significantly, the Commission’s modified certificate program closely parallels the feeder rail line program implemented by 49 U.S.C. § 10910 , differing only to the extent that the Commission’s exemptive power reaches back further in time to encompass state programs started…”
Chicago & North W. Transp. Co. v. United States of Am. & Interstate Com. Comm'n, 678 F.2d 665 (7th Cir. 1982). “4, at 1350, 1354, 1361, were also rejected; and another section of the Staggers Act, allowing the Commission to force the sale of a line where a railroad is refusing to provide adequate service, directs the Commission to set the price of the line at no lower than “net…”
Ry. Labor Executives' Ass'n v. Interstate Com. Comm'n & United States of Am., 735 F.2d 691 (2d Cir. 1984). “RLEA relies on the statement in 49 U.S.C. § 10910 , which is not directly applicable, that: (e) The Commission shall require, to the maximum extent practicable, the use of the employees who would normally have performed work in connection .”
Chatham v. Blount Cnty., 789 So. 2d 235 (Ala. 2001). “1995) (stating that Cheney had elected to be exempt under 49 U.S.C. § 10910 (g)(1), now recodified at § 10907(g)(1)).”
Cheney R.R. v. Interstate Com. Comm'n, 902 F.2d 66 (D.C. Cir. 1990). “In the wake of unfruitful negotiations, Cheney on March 19, 1987 filed a purchase application for the entire route under 49 U.S.C. § 10910 (1988), which requires the forced sale of track designated for abandonment where “a financially responsible person” offers to buy.”
Cisco Coop. Grain Co. v. Interstate Com. Comm'n, 717 F.2d 401 (7th Cir. 1983). “These consolidated petitions for review seek to set aside decisions of the Interstate Commerce Commission (“ICC”) addressing the interaction of the feeder railroad development program, 49 U.S.C. § 10910 , created by the Staggers Rail Act of 1980, and the abandonment program…”
Caddo Antoine & Little Missouri R.R. v. United States, 95 F.3d 740 (8th Cir. 1996). “95-2006 is a petition for review of the Commission’s April 18, 1995, decision granting in part the application of the Caddo Antoine and Little Missouri Railroad Company to purchase under the feeder line development provisions of 49 U.S.C. § 10910 a 52.9-mile line of railroad…”
Simmons v. Interstate Com. Comm'n, 871 F.2d 702 (7th Cir. 1989). “49 U.S.C. § 10910 (g)(1), (g)(2). Therefore, Simmons claimed that KJ was adopting inconsistent positions in seeking to broaden its earlier election of exemption to take full advan *705 tage of the regulatory relief provisions of the Staggers Act.”
Prairie Cent. Ry. Co. v. Interstate Com. Comm'n, 728 F.2d 907 (7th Cir. 1984). “” 49 U.S.C. § 10910 (k) (Supp. V 1981). Under section 401 of the Staggers Act, the Commission must require a track owner to sell a line if a financially responsible applicant files an application to purchase the line while the owner has the line listed in category 1 of its…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.