49 U.S.C. § 112
Repealed. Pub. L. 114–94, div. A, title VI, § 6012(a), Dec. 4, 2015, 129 Stat. 1570]
[repealed]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases, 1946–1984 · leading case: Aetna Ins. Co. v. Ss Ortiguera, 583 F. Supp. 671 (S.D.N.Y. 1984).
Aetna Ins. Co. v. Ss Ortiguera, 583 F. Supp. 671 (S.D.N.Y. 1984). “See 49 U.S.C. § 112 . As a result, Sider was able to and did take delivery of the steel, and was able to and did create a security interest therein in favor of the Toronto Dominion Bank.”
M. M. Landy, Inc. v. John Nicholas, as Receiver of Cont'l Charterers, Inc., Bankrupt, 221 F.2d 923 (5th Cir. 1955). “” Section 8, Comment a points out that under the Uniform Warehouse Receipts Act, § 42, the Uniform Bills of Lading Act, § 33, and 49 U.S.C.A. § 112 , a pledge of goods in the possession of a carrier or warehouseman may be created by delivery of a non-negotiable warehouse receipt…”
Clock v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas R. Co., 407 F. Supp. 448 (E.D. Mo. 1976). “Under the facts established herein, Crawford was the consignor, as Crawford was "the person from whom the goods have been received for shipment". § 400.7-102(c), R.”
GAC Com. Corp. v. Wilson, 271 F. Supp. 242 (S.D.N.Y. 1967). “” 49 U.S.C. § 112 ; see id. § 109. Norwood obviously owed St.”
S. Pac. Co. v. Agencia Joffroy, S. A., 174 P.2d 278 (Ariz. 1946). “These decisions are based upon the provisions of Title 49 U.S.C.A. § 112 , Transportation: “A person to whom a bill has been transferred, but not negotiated, acquires thereby as against the transferor the title to the goods, subject to the terms of any agreement with the…”
Omr Pipe Line Co. v. Gurley Oil Co., 462 F.2d 172 (8th Cir. 1972). “49 U.S.C. § 112 ; G. A. C. Commercial Corp.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.