U.S. Code » Title 49 » Subtitle SUBTITLE II— OTHER GOVERNMENT AGENCIES › Chapter CHAPTER 13— SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER II— ADMINISTRATIVE

49 U.S.C. § 1322

Board action

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 49 CasesGoogle Scholar
(a)Effective Date of Actions.—Unless otherwise provided in subtitle IV, the Board may determine, within a reasonable time, when its actions, other than an action ordering the payment of money, take effect.(b)Terminating and Changing Actions.—An action of the Board remains in effect under its own terms or until superseded. The Board may change, suspend, or set aside any such action on notice. Notice may be given in a manner determined by the Board. A court of competent jurisdiction may suspend or set aside any such action.(c)Reconsidering Actions.—The Board may, at any time on its own initiative because of material error, new evidence, or substantially changed circumstances—(1) reopen a proceeding;(2) grant rehearing, reargument, or reconsideration of an action of the Board; or(3) change an action of the Board.An interested party may petition to reopen and reconsider an action of the Board under this subsection under regulations of the Board.(d)Finality of Actions.—Notwithstanding subtitle IV, an action of the Board under this section is final on the date on which it is served, and a civil action to enforce, enjoin, suspend, or set aside the action may be filed after that date.(Added Pub. L. 104–88, title II, § 201(a), Dec. 29, 1995, 109 Stat. 936, § 722; renumbered § 1322, Pub. L. 114–110, § 3(a)(5), Dec. 18, 2015, 129 Stat. 2228.)Editorial NotesAmendments

2015—Pub. L. 114–110 renumbered section 722 of this title as this section.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 2016–2020 · leading case: Snohomish Cnty., Washington v. STB, 954 F.3d 290 (D.C. Cir. 2020).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Snohomish Cnty., Washington v. STB, 954 F.3d 290 (D.C. Cir. 2020). “532, 539 (1970), and the Board’s general extension of deadlines in response to the shutdown contravened no statutory authority, see 49 U.S.C. § 1322 (c) (permitting the Board to grant reconsideration “at any time”).”
Allied Erecting & Dismantling Co. v. Surface Transp. Bd., 835 F.3d 548 (6th Cir. 2016). “See 49 U.S.C. § 1322 . B. Alied also argues that the tracks on lot 62188 — on the west side of the bridge— became private tracks when Mahoning sold the lot to a real estate company.”
Vill. of Barrington v. Surface Transp. Bd., 892 F.3d 252 (7th Cir. 2018). “By statute, the Board may "reopen a proceeding" and "change an action of the Board" based upon: (1) "material error"; (2) "new evidence"; or (3) "substantially changed circumstances.”
Allied Erecting v. STB (6th Cir. 2016). “See 49 U.S.C. § 1322 . B. Allied also argues that the tracks on lot 62188—on the west side of the bridge—became private tracks when Mahoning sold the lot to a real estate company.”
Vill. of Barrington, IL v. STB (7th Cir. 2018). “” 49 U.S.C. § 1322 (c); see also 49 C.F.R. § 1115.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.