49 U.S.C. § 13504
Exempt motor carrier transportation entirely in one State
Neither the Secretary nor the Board has jurisdiction under this subchapter over transportation, except transportation of household goods, by a motor carrier operating solely within the State of Hawaii. The State of Hawaii may regulate transportation exempt from jurisdiction under this section and, to the extent provided by a motor carrier operating solely within the State of Hawaii, transportation exempt under section 13503 of this title.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 2003–2020 · leading case: Overton v. Uber Techs., Inc., 333 F. Supp. 3d 927 (N.D. Cal. 2018).
Overton v. Uber Techs., Inc., 333 F. Supp. 3d 927 (N.D. Cal. 2018). “§ 13503 (exempting jurisdiction over motor vehicle transportation provided in a terminal area where the transportation is a transfer, collection, or delivery; is provided by a rail or water carrier or freight forwarded; and is incidental to the carrier or freight forwarder's…”
Berlanga v. Terrier Transp., Inc., 269 F. Supp. 2d 821 (N.D. Tex. 2003). “See 49 U.S.C. § 13504 . It is important to note that applicability of the Carmack Amendment no longer depends on the point of origin, so long as the shipment is “between” a point in the Unit *827 ed States and a point in the United States or elsewhere.”
Hilgers v. VIP Moving & Storage Inc (N.D. Tex. 2020). “2003) (citing 49 U.S.C. § 13504 ), the Fifth Circuit has found that a carrier is engaged in interstate commerce when carrying goods that are ultimately bound out-of-state, Merchants Fast Motor Lines, Inc.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.