U.S. Code » Title 49 » Subtitle SUBTITLE V— RAIL PROGRAMS › Part PART E— MISCELLANEOUS › Chapter CHAPTER 281— LAW ENFORCEMENT

49 U.S.C. § 305

GOVERNANCE AND STAFFING OF COMMISSION.

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 49 CasesGoogle Scholar
“(a)Chairman.—The Agreement should provide for the Chairman of the Commission to be elected from among the members of the Commission by a majority vote of the members.“(b)Compensation and Expenses of United States Members.—“(1)Compensation.—Each member of the Commission appointed by the President who is not an officer or employee of the Federal Government shall be compensated at a rate equal to the daily equivalent of the annual rate of basic pay prescribed for level IV of the Executive Schedule under section 5315 of title 5, United States Code, for each day (including travel time) during which such member is engaged in the performance of the duties of the Commission. Each such member who is an officer or employee of the United States shall serve without compensation in addition to that received for services as an officer or employee of the United States.“(2)Travel expenses.—The members of the Commission appointed by the President shall be allowed travel expenses, including per diem in lieu of subsistence, at rates authorized for employees of agencies under subchapter I of chapter 57 of title 5, United States Code, while away from their homes or regular places of business in the performance of services for the Commission.“(c)Staff.—“(1)In general.—The Agreement should provide for the appointment of a staff and an executive director to be the head of the staff.“(2)Compensation.—Funds made available for the Commission by the United States may be used to pay the compensation of the executive director and other personnel at rates fixed by the Commission that are not in excess of the rate payable for level V of the Executive Schedule under section 5316 of title 5, United States Code.“(d)Office.—The Agreement should provide for the office of the Commission to be located in a mutually agreed location within the impacted areas of Alaska, the Yukon Territory, and northern British Columbia.“(e)Meetings.—The Agreement should provide for the Commission to meet at least biannually to review progress and to provide guidance to staff and others, and to hold, in locations within the affected areas of Alaska, the Yukon Territory and northern British Columbia, such additional informational or public meetings as the Commission deems necessary to the conduct of its business.“(f)Procurement of Services.—The Agreement should authorize and encourage the Commission to procure by contract, to the maximum extent practicable, the services (including any temporary and intermittent services) that the Commission determines necessary for carrying out the duties of the Commission. In the case of any contract for the services of an individual, funds made available for the Commission by the United States may not be used to pay for the services of the individual at a rate that exceeds the daily equivalent of the annual rate of basic pay prescribed for level V of the Executive Schedule under section 5316 of title 5, United States Code.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 140 cases, 1938–1993 · leading case: Allen v. State Bd. of Elections, 393 U.S. 544 (1968).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Allen v. State Bd. of Elections, 393 U.S. 544 (1968). · cites it 2× “, 1st Sess., ser. 2, p. 74 (hereinafter House Hearings).”
Shapiro v. United States, 335 U.S. 1 (1948). · cites it 2× “Motor Carrier Act of 1935 [ 49 U.S.C. §§ 305 (d), 304 (a) (1), 311 (d), 317, 318, 320, 322 (g)].”
Levine v. United States, 362 U.S. 610 (1960). · cites it 2× “See 49 U. S. C. § 305 (d). Later that day the grand jury, government counsel, petitioner and his attorney appeared before Judge Levet, sitting in the District Court for the Southern District of New York, the grand jury having sought "the aid and assistance of the Court, in a…”
Twin City Freight, Inc. v. United States, 360 F. Supp. 709 (D. Minnesota 1972). · cites it 7× “This suit is brought pursuant to Section 205(g) of the Interstate Commerce Act, 49 U.S.C. §§ 305 (g), (h), and 17; Section 10 of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.”
Aluminum Co. of Am. v. Admiral Merchants Motor Freight, Inc., 486 F.2d 717 (7th Cir. 1973). · cites it 5× “Section 205(g) of Part II of the Interstate Commerce Commission Act, 49 U.S.C. § 305 (g), provides that any final order made under Part II, which deals with motor carriers, “shall be subject to the same right of relief in court by any party in interest as is now provided in…”
Frozen Food Express v. United States, 351 U.S. 40 (1956). · cites it 2× “550 , as amended, 49 U. S. C. § 305 (g); 60 Stat. 243 , 5 U.”
California v. Zook, 336 U.S. 725 (1949). · cites it 2× “1629, S. 1632, and S. 1635, 74th Cong., 1st Sess.”
United States v. Welden, 377 U.S. 95 (1964). · cites it 2× “543 , 550, 49 U. S. C. § 305 (d). [16] 52 Stat. 1060 , 1065, 29 U.”
East Texas Motor Freight Lines, Inc. v. Frozen Food Express, 351 U.S. 49 (1956). · cites it 2× “550 , as amended, 49 U. S. C. § 305 (g); 60 Stat. 243 , 5 U.”
Aluminum Co. of Amer. v. Admiral Merch. Motor Frgt., Inc., 337 F. Supp. 674 (N.D. Ill. 1972). · cites it 3× “The second main new contention of the defendants deals with the scope of relief available to the plaintiff under § 205(g) of the Act, 49 U.S.C. § 305 (g). 5 Defendants urge a particularly narrow reading of Section 205(g), claiming that it only provides for judicial review of…”
United States v. Emanuel Brown, 247 F.2d 332 (2d Cir. 1957). · cites it 3× “§§ 301-327 despite assurances that under the applicable provisions of law, 49 U.S.C.A. §§ 305 (d), 46, he would be immune from prosecution regarding any matters concerning which he would be required to testify.”
United States v. Contract Steel Carriers, Inc., 350 U.S. 409 (1956). · cites it 2× “The Interstate Commerce Commission brings an appeal from a three-judge district court, 49 U. S. C. § 305 (g), that reversed an order of the ICC, 62 M.”
Show all 140 citing cases →
— 49 U.S.C. § 305(a) — 2 cases
Carolina Scenic Coach Lines v. United States, 56 F. Supp. 801 (W.D.N.C. 1944).
Jones Truck Lines, Inc. v. United States, 321 F. Supp. 821 (W.D. Ark. 1971).
— 49 U.S.C. § 305(e) — 1 case
Buckner Trucking, Inc. v. United States, 354 F. Supp. 1210 (S.D. Tex. 1973).
— 49 U.S.C. § 305(g) — 7 cases
Aluminum Co. of Am. v. Admiral Merchants Motor Freight, Inc., 486 F.2d 717 (7th Cir. 1973). “Section 205(g) of Part II of the Interstate Commerce Commission Act, 49 U.S.C. § 305 (g), provides that any final order made under Part II, which deals with motor carriers, “shall be subject to the same right of relief in court by any party in interest as is now provided in…”
Aluminum Co. of Amer. v. Admiral Merch. Motor Frgt., Inc., 337 F. Supp. 674 (N.D. Ill. 1972). “The second main new contention of the defendants deals with the scope of relief available to the plaintiff under § 205(g) of the Act, 49 U.S.C. § 305 (g). 5 Defendants urge a particularly narrow reading of Section 205(g), claiming that it only provides for judicial review of…”
JT Transp. Co. v. United States, 185 F. Supp. 838 (W.D. Mo. 1960).
Am. Trucking Associations, Inc. v. United States, 170 F. Supp. 38 (D.D.C. 1959).
Motor Truck Supply Co. v. United States, 238 F. Supp. 645 (D. Minnesota 1965).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.