49 U.S.C. § 307
COMMENCEMENT AND TERMINATION OF COMMISSION.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 254
cases, 1938–1989 · leading case: North Am. Van Lines, Inc. v. United States, 412 F. Supp. 782 (N.D. Ind. 1976).
North Am. Van Lines, Inc. v. United States, 412 F. Supp. 782 (N.D. Ind. 1976). “30 At this point, then, NAVL could expect that its Rule 102 petition, with the attendant audit, might close the 7901 proceedings, or at least serve to demonstrate “fitness” under 49 U.S.C.A. § 307 , and that the 8372 proceedings, in which the record had been closed April 15,…”
Lang Transp. Corp. v. United States, 75 F. Supp. 915 (S.D. Cal. 1948). “207(a) of the Federal Motor Carrier Act of 1935, Title 49 U.S.C.A. § 307 (a), 1 granted the application as prayed for by report and order on further hearing of Division 5 of the said Commission, dated April 8, 1946.”
United States v. L. A. Tucker Truck Lines, Inc., 344 U.S. 33 (1952). “NOTES [1] 49 U. S. C. § 307 . [2] 5 U. S. C. § 1010 .”
Trans-Am. Van Serv., Inc. v. United States, 421 F. Supp. 308 (N.D. Tex. 1976). “a certificate shall be issued to any qualified applicant therefor, authorizing the whole or any part of the operations covered by the application, if it is found that the applicant is fit, willing, and able properly to perform the service proposed and to conform to the…”
Bowman Transp., Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight Sys., Inc., 419 U.S. 281 (1975). “551 , 49 U. S. C. § 307 , empower the *285 Commission to grant an application for a certificate if it finds (1) that the applicant is “fit, willing, and able properly to perform the service proposed”; and (2) that the service proposed “is or will be required by the present or…”
Norfolk S. Bus Corp. v. United States, 96 F. Supp. 756 (E.D. Va. 1950). “§ 307 (a): "Subject to section 310, a certificate shall be issued to any qualified applicant therefor, authorizing the whole or any part of the operations covered by the application, if it is found that the applicant is fit, willing, and able properly to perform the service…”
Schaffer Transp. Co. v. United States, 355 U.S. 83 (1957). “551 , 49 U. S. C. § 307 , although both relate to motor carrier service by railroads.”
United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co., 351 U.S. 377 (1956). “§ 481 (d) (1951) (limits market entry); Motor Carrier Act, 49 U. S. C. § 307 (1952) (motor vehicle common carriers).”
Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. Interstate Com. Comm'n, 194 F. Supp. 31 (S.D. Ill. 1961). “" Section 207(a) of the Interstate Commerce Act ( 49 U.S.C.A. § 307 (a) provides in part as follows: "Subject to section 210, a certificate shall be issued to any qualified applicant therefor, authorizing the whole or any part of the operations covered by the application, if it…”
Ry. Express Agency, Inc. v. United States, 153 F. Supp. 738 (S.D.N.Y. 1957). “In this proceeding, commenced in August 1955, United Parcel applied for a certificate of public convenience and necessity, pursuant to 49 U.S.C.A. § 307 (a), to operate as a common carrier by motor vehicle of general commodities, with certain exceptions, over described irregular…”
A. B. & C. Motor Transp. Co. v. United States, 69 F. Supp. 166 (D. Mass. 1946). “The certificate in question here was by application dated July 1, 1944, and granted under the ’ provisions of Section 207 of the Act, 49 U.S.C.A. § 307 . Applicant had previously requested the authority granted in its “grandfather” application but it was denied because of lack…”
Lester C. Newton Trucking Co. v. United States, 264 F. Supp. 869 (D. Del. 1967). “568 ), and later a second application pursuant to 49 U.S.C.A. § 307 seeking an extension of its authority in the event it was not satisfied with the scope of its existing authority as determined in the "grandfather" proceedings.”
— 49 U.S.C. § 307(a) — 4 cases
Nat'l Trailer Convoy, Inc. v. United States, 381 F. Supp. 878 (N.D. Okla. 1973).
Twin City Freight, Inc. v. United States, 360 F. Supp. 709 (D. Minnesota 1972).
Mississippi East, Inc. v. United States, 301 F. Supp. 1332 (W.D. Pa. 1969).
Safeway Trails, Inc. v. Interstate Com. Comm'n, 176 F. Supp. 201 (D.D.C. 1959).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.