49 U.S.C. § 31705
Fuel use tax
Historical and Revision Notes | ||
|---|---|---|
Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
31705 | 49:11506 (note). | Dec. 18, 1991, Pub. L. 102–240, § 4008(g), 105 Stat. 2154. |
In subsection (b), the words “as it applies to” are substituted for “with respect to” for clarity.
In subsection (c), before clause (1), the words “a State not participating in the Agreement when the amendment is made is not subject to the conformity requirements of subsections (a) and (b) of this section in regard to the amendment” are substituted for “conformity by a State that is not participating in such Agreement when such amendment is made may not be required with respect to such amendment” for clarity.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 2001–2012 · leading case: May Trucking Co. v. Oregon Dep't of Transp., 388 F.3d 1261 (9th Cir. 2004).
May Trucking Co. v. Oregon Dep't of Transp., 388 F.3d 1261 (9th Cir. 2004). “49 U.S.C. § 31705 . Thus, federal law mandates participation in IFTA for all states that impose a fuel tax.”
Hi-Way Dispatch, Inc. v. Indiana Dep't of State Revenue, 756 N.E.2d 587 (Ind. T.C. 2001). “" 49 U.S.C. § 31705 (2000). See also id., § 31701(6) (defining "State" as the "48 contiguous States and the District of Columbia").”
S. Pines Trucking v. Commonwealth, 42 A.3d 1222 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2012). “Membership in IFTA was required by 49 U.S.C. § 31705 . 3 .The Department credited $66,077.”
Senex Explosives, Inc. v. Commonwealth, 58 A.3d 131 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2012). “Membership in IFTA was required by 49 U.S.C. § 31705 . . This Court is entitled to the broadest scope of review when considering the propriety of an order of the Board of Finance and Revenue because, although we hear such cases in our appellate jurisdiction, we function…”
May Trucking Co. v. Dep't of Transp., 126 P.3d 695 (Or. Ct. App. 2006). “49 USC § 31705 (1994). ODOT has the authority to enter into an international fuel tax agreement under ORS 825.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.