49 U.S.C. § 332

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 49 CasesGoogle Scholar
Repealed. Pub. L. 115–254, div. B, title III, § 341(b)(2), Oct. 5, 2018, 132 Stat. 3287.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1959–2000 · leading case: Org. of Minority Vendors, Inc. v. Illinois Cent. Gulf R.R., 579 F. Supp. 574 (N.D. Ill. 1983).
Org. of Minority Vendors, Inc. v. Illinois Cent. Gulf R.R., 579 F. Supp. 574 (N.D. Ill. 1983). · cites it 2× “49 U.S.C. § 332 . The non-discrimination and affirmative action regulations promulgated under § 803(d) and summarized above have remained in effect.”
Barsh v. Mullins, 338 P.2d 845 (Okla. 1959). · cites it 2× “49 U.S.C.A. § 332 (a, b). The Act specifically provides that "any person, whether carrier, shipper, consignee, or broker, or any officer, employee, agent, or representative thereof" who, by the means of "any false statement or representation, or by the use of any false or…”
United States v. Photogrammetric Data Servs., Inc., 103 F. Supp. 2d 875 (E.D. Va. 2000). “49 U.S.C. § 332 (b). 3 . Petullo, Schafer, and Gibson are cases involving 18 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.