49 U.S.C. § 46314
Entering aircraft or airport area in violation of security requirements
Historical and Revision Notes | ||
|---|---|---|
Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
46314 | 49 App.:1472(r). | Aug. 23, 1958, Pub. L. 85–726, 72 Stat. 731, § 902(r); added Dec. 30, 1987, Pub. L. 100–223, § 204(f)(2), 101 Stat. 1520. |
In subsection (b), the words “fined under title 18” are substituted for “a fine not to exceed $1,000” and “a fine not to exceed $10,000” for consistency with title 18.
In subsection (b)(1), the words “Upon conviction” are omitted as surplus.
In subsection (b)(2), the words “airport area” are substituted for “secured area” for consistency in this section.
2011—Subsec. (b)(2). Pub. L. 112–74, § 564(b), inserted “with intent to evade security procedures or restrictions or” after “of this section”.
Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 112–74, § 564(c), added subsec. (c).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2002–2024 · leading case: United States v. Rosemary Schier, 438 F.3d 1104 (11th Cir. 2006).
United States v. Rosemary Schier, 438 F.3d 1104 (11th Cir. 2006). “§ 46505 (b)(1) (Count 1), and knowingly entering an aircraft with a concealed weapon contrary to security requirements, in violation of 49 U.S.C. § 46314 (a), (b)(1) (Count 2). On appeal, Schier argues that: (1) the district court violated the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.”
United States v. Lundy, 416 F. Supp. 2d 325 (E.D. Pa. 2005). “§ 1001 (Counts 2 and 3); and entering, in violation of security regulations, an airport area that serves an air carrier in violation of 49 U.S.C. § 46314 (Counts 4 and 5). (Indictment, Doc.”
Hughes v. Eleventh Jud. Circuit of Florida, 274 F. Supp. 2d 1334 (S.D. Fla. 2003). “§ 46313 ), entering aircraft or airport area in violation of security requirements ( 49 U.S.C. § 46314 ), lighting violations involving transporting controlled substances by aircraft not providing air transportation ( 49 U.”
United States v. Hedrick, 207 F. Supp. 2d 710 (S.D. Ohio 2002). “(2) All case files within the last five years referred to the Government for review, consideration, consultation, or prosecution of alleged violations of 49 U.S.C. § 46314 and which the Government either declined prosecution or sought an indictment, including the resolution of…”
United States v. Holtzhauer, 463 F. Supp. 2d 742 (S.D. Ohio 2006). “Holtzhauer is accused of bringing a gun into an airport security area in violation 49 U.S.C. § 46314 (a). On October 11, 2006, a trial to the Court occurred in this matter.”
Leacock v. United States, 258 F. Supp. 3d 218 (D. Mass. 2017). “§§ 1956 (a)(3) (Counts 3 *219 & 4); and two counts of illegally entering an airport and airport area with intent to commit a felony therein, 49 U.S.C. § 46314 (a) & (b)(2) (Counts 10 & 11).”
Flint v. United States (E.D. Mich. 2024). “Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. § 46314 (a) and (b)(2), a person may not knowingly and willfully enter an airport area that serves an air carrier in violation of security requirements and regulations prescribed under 49 U.”
United States v. $148,145.00 In U.S. Currency (C.D. Cal. 2024). “Based on his attempts to avoid detection by TSA on July 25, 2017, Flint was 14 convicted of 49 U.S.C. § 46314 (a), (b)(2) for “Entering an Airport Area in Violation of 15 Security Screening Requirements” and for moving the Currency through airport security 16 while avoiding…”
United States v. Rasondo Norris, 589 F. App'x 457 (11th Cir. 2014). “§§ 846 , 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A), and one count of entering an airport area in violation of security requirements, in violation of 49 U.S.C. § 46314 (a), (b)(2). At sentencing, the district court determined that *458 Norris had possessed a firearm in connection with the cocaine…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.