U.S. Code » Title 5 » Part PART I— THE AGENCIES GENERALLY › Chapter CHAPTER 10— FEDERAL ADVISORY COMMITTEES

5 U.S.C. § 1001

Definitions

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 5 CasesGoogle Scholar
In this chapter:(1)Administrator.—The term “Administrator” means the Administrator of General Services.(2)Advisory committee.—(A)In general.—The term “advisory committee” means a committee, board, commission, council, conference, panel, task force, or other similar group, or any subcommittee or other subgroup thereof (hereafter in this paragraph referred to as “committee”) that is established or utilized to obtain advice or recommendations for the President or one or more agencies or officers of the Federal Government and that is—(i) established by statute or reorganization plan;(ii) established or utilized by the President; or(iii) established or utilized by one or more agencies.(B)Exclusions.—The term “advisory committee” excludes—(i) a committee that is composed wholly of full-time, or permanent part-time, officers or employees of the Federal Government; and(ii) a committee that is created by the National Academy of Sciences or the National Academy of Public Administration.(3)Agency.—The term “agency” has the meaning given the term in section 551 of this title.(4)Presidential advisory committee.—The term “Presidential advisory committee” means an advisory committee that advises the President.(Pub. L. 117–286, § 3(a), Dec. 27, 2022, 136 Stat. 4197.)

Historical and Revision Notes

Revised

Section

Source (U.S. Code)

Source (Statutes at Large)

1001

5 U.S.C. App. (FACA § 3)

Pub. L. 92–463, § 3, Oct. 6, 1972, 86 Stat. 770; Pub. L. 105–153, § 2(a), Dec. 17, 1997, 111 Stat. 2689.

[Although not mentioned in the explanation contained in H. Rept. 117–193, in par. (1), “ ‘Administrator’ means the Administrator of General Services” substituted for “ ‘Director’ means the Director of the Office of Management and Budget” because of section 5F of Reorganization Plan No. 1 of 1977 (5 U.S.C. App.).]

Statutory Notes and Related SubsidiariesShort Title of 1997 Act

Pub. L. 105–153, § 1, Dec. 17, 1997, 111 Stat. 2689, provided that: “This Act [see Tables for classification] may be cited as the ‘Federal Advisory Committee Act Amendments of 1997’.”

Short Title of 1972 Act

Pub. L. 92–463, § 1, Oct. 6, 1972, 86 Stat. 770, provided that: “This Act [see Tables for classification] may be cited as the ‘Federal Advisory Committee Act’.”

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 573 cases (13 in the last 5 years), 1946–2026 · leading case: United States v. L. A. Tucker Truck Lines, Inc., 344 U.S. 33 (1952).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
United States v. L. A. Tucker Truck Lines, Inc., 344 U.S. 33 (1952). · cites it 2× “The Congress decided *41 to separate the judicial functions of examiners from the investigative and prosecuting functions. It required the separation in cases involving property interests as well as those involving personal liberty.”
Harisiades v. Shaughnessy, 342 U.S. 580 (1951). · cites it 2× “no procedural requirement shall be mandatory as to any agency proceeding initiated prior to the effective date of such requirement.”
Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 340 U.S. 474 (1951). “237 , 5 U. S. C. § 1001 et seq. The form finally adopted reads as follows: “Sec.”
Local 1494 of the Int'l Ass'n of Firefighters v. City of Coeur D'Alene, 586 P.2d 1346 (Idaho 1978). · cites it 2× “237 , 5 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq., where the substantial evidence rule already prevailed, and "[i]n order to clarify any ambiguity in that statute, however, the committee inserted the words `questions of fact, if supported by substantial evidence on the record considered as a whole…”
O'Leary v. Brown-Pac.-Maxon, Inc., 340 U.S. 504 (1951). · cites it 2× “237 , 5 U. S. C. § 1001 et seq. The standard, therefore, is that discussed in Universal Camera Corp.”
Hotch v. United States, 212 F.2d 280 (9th Cir. 1954). · cites it 4× “237 , 5 U.S. C.A. § 1001 et seq., in which it described certain classes of documents which it required to be published.”
United States v. Storer Broad. Co., 351 U.S. 192 (1956). · cites it 2× “It was final agency action, 5 U. S. C. § 1001 (c) and (g), by which Storer claimed to be "aggrieved.”
Fed. Trade Comm'n v. Dean Foods Co., 384 U.S. 597 (1966). · cites it 2× “The Department nonetheless insisted in Wong Yang Sung that hearings in deportation cases did not have to conform to the requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act.”
Marcello v. Bonds, 349 U.S. 302 (1955). · cites it 2× “237 , 5 U. S. C. § 1001 et seq. The hearing officer overruled these objections.”
Am. Trucking Assns., Inc. v. United States, 344 U.S. 298 (1953). · cites it 2× “Since there were only minor differences in the content of the two cases appealed, they may be treated together. I. Introduction. —We consider at the outset the existing conditions of the motor truck industry and its regulation as developed during the Commission's hearings…”
Whitney Nat'l Bank in Jefferson Par. v. Bank of New Orleans & Trust Co., 379 U.S. 411 (1965). · cites it 2× “Respondents attempt to ground support for the District Court's asserted jurisdiction on the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U. S. C. §§ 1001 , 1009 (1958 ed.), which provides that "Every .”
Harmon v. Brucker, 355 U.S. 579 (1958). · cites it 2× “237 , 5 U. S. C. § 1001 et seq., have any application to these cases.”
Show all 573 citing cases →
— 5 U.S.C. § 1001(a) — 2 cases
Belford Barnett v. Pennsylvania-Reading Seashare Lines, 245 F.2d 579 (3rd Cir. 1957).
George R. Bell v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue, 278 F.2d 100 (4th Cir. 1960).
— 5 U.S.C. § 1001(d) — 1 case
Fed. Trade Comm'n v. Hallmark, Inc., & Ben Cole, Vice President, Hallmark, Inc., 265 F.2d 433 (7th Cir. 1959).
— 5 U.S.C. § 1001(e) — 1 case
Bhd. of Locomotive Engineers v. United States, 217 F. Supp. 98 (N.D. Ohio 1963).
— 5 U.S.C. § 1001(g) — 1 case
Samuel B. Franklin & Co. v. Sec. & Exch. Comm'n, 290 F.2d 719 (9th Cir. 1961).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.