5 U.S.C. § 304

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 5 CasesGoogle Scholar

Not later than 2½ years after the effective date of titles I and II of this Act, the Commission shall—“(1) prepare an interim report containing recommendations as to what, if any, legislative or administrative action shall be taken based upon the results of experiments conducted under this Act [enacting section 5550a of this title and this note], and“(2) submit copies of such report to the President, the Speaker of the House, and the President pro tempore of the Senate.The Commission shall prepare a final report with regard to experiments conducted under this Act [enacting section 5550a of this title and this note] and shall submit copies of such report to the President, the Speaker of the House, and the President pro tempore of the Senate not later than 3 years after such effective date.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases, 1977–1983 · leading case: Fairfield Sci. Corp. v. United States, 222 Ct. Cl. 167 (Ct. Cl. 1979).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Fairfield Sci. Corp. v. United States, 222 Ct. Cl. 167 (Ct. Cl. 1979). · cites it 2× “Plaintiff states that authority for the subpoena and deposition may be found in 5 U.S.C. § 304 . There was no question of disproportional expense to defendant in subpoenaing the author or custodian of the letter.”

Proposed Legislation to Grant Additional Power to the President's Comm'n on Organized Crime (OLC 1983). “26 5 U.S.C. § 304 (a). 137 the Attorney General may apply;27 by limiting the distance witnesses may be forced to travel;28 or by permitting witnesses to be excused by the court if the required testimony or evidence would tend to incriminate them or subject them to a criminal…”

Am. Dredging Co., 212 Ct. Cl. 582 (Ct. Cl. 1977). “Further, in Aircraft Associates, the subpoena was issued pursuant to statute, 5 U.S.C. §304 (1970), which allows a witness to be subpoenaed upon application to a judge or clerk of a court of the United States, but requires that the application be made in the first instance by…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.