5 U.S.C. § 3346
Time limitation
A prior section 3346, Pub. L. 89–554,
Section effective 30 days after
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 109
cases (83 in the last 5 years), 1976–2025 · leading case: Barbara Rush v. Kilolo Kijakazi, 65 F.4th 114 (4th Cir. 2023).
Barbara Rush v. Kilolo Kijakazi, 65 F.4th 114 (4th Cir. 2023). “They argue that no one may serve as an acting officer under 5 U.S.C. § 3346 (a)(2), which allows acting service while a nomination is pending in the Senate, unless that nomination occurred during the initial 210-day period of acting service allowed by 5 U.”
Seago v. O'Malley, 91 F.4th 386 (5th Cir. 2024). “5 U.S.C. § 3346 (a); see also id. §§ 3346(b) (imposing different time limitations when nominations are rejected, withdrawn, or returned), 3346(c) (adjusting time limitations when vacancy occurs during adjournment of Congress sine die).”
Hooks Ex Rel. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Kitsap Tenant Support Servs., Inc., 816 F.3d 550 (9th Cir. 2016). “Congress may have decided -that only first assistants—-rather than-just any GS-15 employee—hold the requisite seniority and experience to appropriately serve in both capacities (or, perhaps more saliently, to continue serving in an acting capacity even if the nomination does not…”
Fed. Deposit Ins. v. Hurwitz, 384 F. Supp. 2d 1039 (S.D. Tex. 2005). “5 U.S.C. § 3346 (a)(1), cl. 2. 218 . U.S.”
SW Gen., Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 796 F.3d 67 (D.C. Cir. 2015). “§ 153(d) (permitting service for 40 days, tolled while nomination is pending before Senate), with 5 U.S.C. § 3346 (permitting service for 210 days, tolled while first or second nomination is pending before Senate).”
United States v. David Smith, 962 F.3d 755 (4th Cir. 2020). “See 5 U.S.C. § 3346 ; see also NLRB v. SW General, Inc.”
In re Grand Jury Investigation, 315 F. Supp. 3d 602 (D.C. Cir. 2018). “at 4-5, due to the time limits that the FVRA imposes on an acting officer's service, see 5 U.S.C. § 3346 . The Special Counsel argues that "[i]t would make no sense for a limited 'Acting' role to expire after a period of time when recusal continues indefinitely," and that "where…”
Martin v. Albany Bus. Journal, Inc., 780 F. Supp. 927 (N.D.N.Y. 1992). “Congress made that abundantly clear when it enacted the provisions codified at 5 U.S.C. § 3346 (1988). 12 As the acting administrator, Fra *935 ser is empowered to perform the administrator’s duties.”
Garrett Kajmowicz v. Matthew Whitaker, 42 F.4th 138 (3rd Cir. 2022). “” 5 U.S.C. § 3346 (a)(1). 19 officer could ratify any action performed by an unlawfully serving acting predecessor.”
Muffley Ex Rel. NLRB v. Massey Energy Co., 547 F. Supp. 2d 536 (S.D.W. Va 2008). “” 5 U.S.C. § 3346 (a). *543 The General Counsel of the National Labor Relations Board is an executive officer who is appointed by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate.”
Action for Boston Cmty. Dev., Inc. v. Shalala, 983 F. Supp. 222 (D. Mass. 1997). “5 U.S.C. § 3346 . Section 3347 of Title Five allows for the President to appoint the head of another executive department, or another constitutional officér, instead of the first assistant, to fill the vacancy.”
Appleby v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec. (N.D. Iowa 2023). “The Plain Language of 5 U.S.C. § 3346 and its Legislative History Support the Interpretation That a Springback Provision Enabled Berryhill’s Second Term as Acting Commissioner.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.