5 U.S.C. § 5401
Purpose
The purpose of this chapter is to promote, through the creation of a Human Capital Performance Fund, greater performance in the Federal Government. Monies from the Fund will be used to reward agencies’ highest performing and most valuable employees. This Fund will offer Federal managers a new tool to recognize employee performance that is critical to the achievement of agency missions.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1984–1988 · leading case: Jacqueline A. Tommas Griffith v. Fed. Labor Relations Auth., 842 F.2d 487 (D.C. Cir. 1988).
Jacqueline A. Tommas Griffith v. Fed. Labor Relations Auth., 842 F.2d 487 (D.C. Cir. 1988). “In providing for merit pay in 1978 in the CSRA, 5 U.S.C. § 5401 et seq. (1982), 7 Congress gave off some conflicting signals as to the status of within-grade pay increases, but it changed neither the language nor, we think, the basic goal of flexibility.”
John Veit v. Margaret Heckler, Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 746 F.2d 508 (9th Cir. 1984). “See 5 U.S.C. §§ 5401 et seq. Nothing in the statute or applicable regulations creates any expectation or entitlement to either a merit pay increase or to notice that an employee will receive a relatively low performance rating.”
Prof'l Managers' Ass'n, George H. Coffin, Jr., R. Dennis Morris, Judith B. Tomaso v. United States of Am., 761 F.2d 740 (D.C. Cir. 1985). “Appellants alleged that the Office of Personnel Management (“OPM”) had violated various statutory provisions and the Constitution when it implemented the Merit Pay System provided for in the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978 (“CSRA”), 5 U.S.C. § 5401 et seq. (1982). To correct…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.