5 U.S.C. § 5534
Dual employment and pay of Reserves and National Guardsmen
A Reserve of the armed forces or member of the National Guard may accept a civilian office or position under the Government of the United States or the government of the District of Columbia, and he is entitled to receive the pay of that office or position in addition to pay and allowances as a Reserve or member of the National Guard.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 12
cases, 1976–2020 · leading case: Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,745 Dean Woods, & All Other Persons Similarly Situated v. Covington Cnty. Bank, Edward Hoglund v. Covington Cnty. Bank, 537 F.2d 804 (5th Cir. 1976).
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,745 Dean Woods, & All Other Persons Similarly Situated v. Covington Cnty. Bank, Edward Hoglund v. Covington Cnty. Bank, 537 F.2d 804 (5th Cir. 1976). “Further evidence of this policy is found in 5 U.S.C. § 5534 which provides: A Reserve of the armed forces or member of the National Guard may accept a civilian office or position under the Government of the United States or the Government of the District of Columbia, and he is…”
Puglisi v. United States, 215 Ct. Cl. 86 (Ct. Cl. 1977). “5 U.S.C. § 5534 . In this suit for the amount of retirement pay withheld from them, claimants assert that the Act is unconstitutional, especially because it distinguishes between retired regular officers and retired reserve officers to the detriment of the former group.”
Pamela Lea Maier v. Verne Orr, Sec'y of the Air Force, 758 F.2d 1578 (Fed. Cir. 1985). “Though legally entitled to remain a member of the active reserve, 5 U.S.C. § 5534 , he elected, in the spirit of Canon 5 C(3), Code of Judicial Conduct for United States Judges, to retire from the Reserve prematurely in 1976.”
Allen Sharp, Lieutenant Colonel, United States Air Force Reserves v. Caspar Weinberger, Sec'y of Def., 798 F.2d 1521 (D.C. Cir. 1986). “§ 5534 (1982), which permits reservists to accept civilian employment from the federal government; that appellees were contractually committed to retain appellant in the Ready Reserve until August 31, 1986 under the terms of a Ready Reserve Service Agreement; that that…”
Sharp v. Weinberger, 593 F. Supp. 886 (D.D.C. 1984). “7, as applied to Ready Reserve members who are also federal employees, violates 5 U.S.C. § 5534 (1982), which states that A Reserve of the armed forces may accept a civilian office or position under the Government of the United States .”
Kientz v. Comm'r, SSA, 954 F.3d 1277 (10th Cir. 2020). “2 See 5 U.S.C. § 5534 . And Plaintiff paid Social Security taxes on those National Guard wages—covered employment.”
Ulmet v. United States, 17 Cl. Ct. 679 (Ct. Cl. 1989). “§ 5534 (1982), that even if he had been on full-time active duty, during the period determined to be the constructive active duty period for which he should be entitled to a back pay adjustment, the defendant would have permitted him to earn money from sources outside the…”
United States v. Lane, 60 M.J. 781 (A.F.C.C.A. 2004). “(Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act of 1994, prohibiting discrimination against persons because of their service in the military).”
Kelly Stephen Jennings v. Soc. Sec. Admin., 2016 MSPB 31 (MSPB 2016). “She held that, although 5 U.S.C. § 5534 provides that a Reserve of the Armed Forces “may accept a civilian .”
Kelly Stephen Jennings v. Soc. Sec. Admin., 2016 MSPB 31 (MSPB 2016). “She held that, although 5 U.S.C. § 5534 provides that a Reserve of the Armed Forces “may accept a civilian .”
Kelly Stephen Jennings v. Soc. Sec. Admin., 2016 MSPB 32 (MSPB 2016). “She held that, although 5 U.S.C. § 5534 provides that a Reserve of the Armed Forces “may accept a civilian .”
Kelly Stephen Jennings v. Soc. Sec. Admin., 2016 MSPB 32 (MSPB 2016). “She held that, although 5 U.S.C. § 5534 provides that a Reserve of the Armed Forces “may accept a civilian .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.