5 U.S.C. § 6121
Definitions
2009—Par. (1). Pub. L. 111–68 substituted “the Library of Congress, the Architect of the Capitol, and the Botanic Garden” for “and the Library of Congress”.
1996—Par. (2). Pub. L. 104–106 amended par. (2) generally. Prior to amendment, par. (2) read as follows: “ ‘employee’ has the meaning given it by section 2105 of this title;”.
1989—Par. (1). Pub. L. 101–163 inserted “the Government Printing Office,” after “military department,”.
“Government Publishing Office” substituted for “Government Printing Office” in par. (1) on authority of section 1301(b) of Pub. L. 113–235, set out as a note preceding section 301 of Title 44, Public Printing and Documents.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 15
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1988–2025 · leading case: Doe v. United States, 513 F.3d 1348 (Fed. Cir. 2008).
Doe v. United States, 513 F.3d 1348 (Fed. Cir. 2008). “5 U.S.C. § 6121 (6). The SSA also allows its employees to receive “compensatory time” in lieu of overtime pay.”
Abbey v. United States, 82 Fed. Cl. 722 (Fed. Cl. 2008). “See 5 U.S.C. §§ 6121 (4), 6122. The exceptions contained in sections 5543, 6121, 6122, and 6123 do not, however, apply to plaintiffs under the provisions of the Department of Transportation and Related Agencies Appropriation Act of 1996, Pub.”
Whalen v. United States, 93 Fed. Cl. 579 (Fed. Cl. 2010). “5 U.S.C. § 6121 (6) (“ ‘[OJvertime hours’, when used with respect to flexible schedule programs under sections 6122 through 6126 of this title, means all hours in excess of 8 hours in a day or 40 hours in a week which are officially ordered in advance, but does not include…”
Aletta v. United States, 70 Fed. Cl. 600 (Fed. Cl. 2006). “See 5 U.S.C. §§ 6121 (4), 6122. A “compressed” schedule is one in which an employee works 80 hours during each two-week pay period, but does so in less than 10 days.”
Doe v. United States, 74 Fed. Cl. 592 (Fed. Cl. 2007). “Because credit hours are not overtime under 5 U.S.C. § 6121 (6) and cannot be compensated as such, the Court dismisses the credit hours claim for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.”
Abbey v. United States, 124 Fed. Cl. 397 (Fed. Cl. 2015). “2008) (citing 5 U.S.C. § 6121 (6)). Whereas “credit hours” are defined as hours “in excess of an employee’s basic work requirement,[ 4 ] which the employee elects to work,” id.”
Yanko v. United States, 127 Fed. Cl. 682 (Fed. Cl. 2016). “§ 6103 (Holidays); 5 U.S.C. § 6121 (Flexible and Compressed Work Schedules Definitions); 28 U.”
Blair v. United States, 15 Cl. Ct. 763 (Ct. Cl. 1988). “” 5 U.S.C. § 6121 (7) (1982). In plaintiff’s case, the specified hours in his compressed or AWS were eight ten-hour days in an eighty-hour, biweekly work requirement schedule.”
Austin v. United States, 128 Fed. Cl. 314 (Fed. Cl. 2016). “See 5 U.S.C. § 6121 (5)(A) and (B). But it is clear that section 6103(d) only addresses full-time employees on compressed schedules because section 6103(d)(2) grants agencies discretion to establish certain employees’ “in lieu of’ holidays “other than as provided by subsection…”
Coyner v. United States (Fed. Cl. 2022). “” 5 U.S.C. § 6121 (4), (6) (defining “credit hours” and “overtime hours” separately); Doe v.”
Abbey v. United States (Fed. Cl. 2015). “2008) (citing 5 U.S.C. § 6121 (6)). Whereas “credit hours” are defined as hours “in excess of an employee’s basic work requirement,[4] which the employee elects to work,” id.”
Auth. to Permit Part-Time Employees to Work Regularly Scheduled Workweeks of 33 to 39 Hours (OLC 2015). “5 U.S.C. § 6121 (5)(B). Congress also amended the Act’s definition of “part-time career employment” to state that it includes part-time employment of “32 to 64 hours during a biweekly pay period in the case of a flexible or com- pressed schedule under subchapter II of chapter 61…”
— 5 U.S.C. § 6121(6) — 1 case
Aletta v. United States, 70 Fed. Cl. 600 (Fed. Cl. 2006). “See 5 U.S.C. §§ 6121 (4), 6122. A “compressed” schedule is one in which an employee works 80 hours during each two-week pay period, but does so in less than 10 days.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.