Notes of Decisions
Cited in
15
cases (
2 in the last 5 years), 1988–2025 · leading case:
Doe v. United States, 513 F.3d 1348 (Fed. Cir. 2008).
Doe v. United States, 513 F.3d 1348 (Fed. Cir. 2008).
· cites it 3× “5 U.S.C. § 6121 (6). The SSA also allows its employees to receive “compensatory time” in lieu of overtime pay.”
Abbey v. United States, 82 Fed. Cl. 722 (Fed. Cl. 2008).
· cites it 3× “See 5 U.S.C. §§ 6121 (4), 6122. The exceptions contained in sections 5543, 6121, 6122, and 6123 do not, however, apply to plaintiffs under the provisions of the Department of Transportation and Related Agencies Appropriation Act of 1996, Pub.”
Whalen v. United States, 93 Fed. Cl. 579 (Fed. Cl. 2010).
· cites it 2× “5 U.S.C. § 6121 (6) (“ ‘[OJvertime hours’, when used with respect to flexible schedule programs under sections 6122 through 6126 of this title, means all hours in excess of 8 hours in a day or 40 hours in a week which are officially ordered in advance, but does not include…”
Aletta v. United States, 70 Fed. Cl. 600 (Fed. Cl. 2006).
· cites it 4× “See 5 U.S.C. §§ 6121 (4), 6122. A “compressed” schedule is one in which an employee works 80 hours during each two-week pay period, but does so in less than 10 days.”
Doe v. United States, 74 Fed. Cl. 592 (Fed. Cl. 2007).
· cites it 3× “Because credit hours are not overtime under 5 U.S.C. § 6121 (6) and cannot be compensated as such, the Court dismisses the credit hours claim for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.”
Abbey v. United States, 124 Fed. Cl. 397 (Fed. Cl. 2015).
· cites it 2× “2008) (citing 5 U.S.C. § 6121 (6)). Whereas “credit hours” are defined as hours “in excess of an employee’s basic work requirement,[ 4 ] which the employee elects to work,” id.”
Yanko v. United States, 127 Fed. Cl. 682 (Fed. Cl. 2016).
“§ 6103 (Holidays); 5 U.S.C. § 6121 (Flexible and Compressed Work Schedules Definitions); 28 U.”
Blair v. United States, 15 Cl. Ct. 763 (Ct. Cl. 1988).
“” 5 U.S.C. § 6121 (7) (1982). In plaintiff’s case, the specified hours in his compressed or AWS were eight ten-hour days in an eighty-hour, biweekly work requirement schedule.”
Austin v. United States, 128 Fed. Cl. 314 (Fed. Cl. 2016).
“See 5 U.S.C. § 6121 (5)(A) and (B). But it is clear that section 6103(d) only addresses full-time employees on compressed schedules because section 6103(d)(2) grants agencies discretion to establish certain employees’ “in lieu of’ holidays “other than as provided by subsection…”
Coyner v. United States, No. 20-712 (Fed. Cl. Sept. 2, 2022).
· cites it 4× “” 5 U.S.C. § 6121 (4), (6) (defining “credit hours” and “overtime hours” separately); Doe v.”
Abbey v. United States, No. 07-272 (Fed. Cl. Dec. 1, 2015).
· cites it 4× “2008) (citing 5 U.S.C. § 6121 (6)). Whereas “credit hours” are defined as hours “in excess of an employee’s basic work requirement,[4] which the employee elects to work,” id.”
5 U.S.C. § 6121(6): 1 case
Aletta v. United States, 70 Fed. Cl. 600 (Fed. Cl. 2006).
“See 5 U.S.C. §§ 6121 (4), 6122. A “compressed” schedule is one in which an employee works 80 hours during each two-week pay period, but does so in less than 10 days.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.