U.S. Code » Title 5 » Part PART III— EMPLOYEES › Subpart Subpart E— Attendance and Leave › Chapter CHAPTER 61— HOURS OF WORK › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER II— FLEXIBLE AND COMPRESSED WORK SCHEDULES

5 U.S.C. § 6130

Application of programs in the case of collective bargaining agreements

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 5 CasesGoogle Scholar
(a)(1) In the case of employees in a unit represented by an exclusive representative, any flexible or compressed work schedule, and the establishment and termination of any such schedule, shall be subject to the provisions of this subchapter and the terms of a collective bargaining agreement between the agency and the exclusive representative.(2) Employees within a unit represented by an exclusive representative shall not be included within any program under this subchapter except to the extent expressly provided under a collective bargaining agreement between the agency and the exclusive representative.(b) An agency may not participate in a flexible or compressed schedule program under a collective bargaining agreement which contains premium pay provisions which are inconsistent with the provisions of section 6123 or 6128 of this title, as applicable.(Added Pub. L. 97–221, § 2(a)(2), July 23, 1982, 96 Stat. 231.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1988–1988 · leading case: Illinois Nat'l Guard v. Fed. Labor Relations Auth., 854 F.2d 1396 (D.C. Cir. 1988).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Illinois Nat'l Guard v. Fed. Labor Relations Auth., 854 F.2d 1396 (D.C. Cir. 1988). “5 U.S.C. § 6130 (a) (1982). If there is no union, the agency cannot impose a compressed work schedule (although it may apparently impose a flexible schedule) without the approval of a majority of the affected employees.”
Bureau of Land Mgmt. v. Fed. Labor Relations Auth., 864 F.2d 89 (9th Cir. 1988). · cites it 2× “1 5 U.S.C. § 6130 . In this case the Union submitted a comprehensive AWS plan to the Bureau of Land Management Lakeview District Office (BLM), to afford the office workers AWS options.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.