5 U.S.C. § 7111
Exclusive recognition of labor organizations
Section effective 90 days after
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 34
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1982–2025 · leading case: Jeffrey W. Eisinger v. Fed. Labor Relations Auth., 218 F.3d 1097 (Fed. Cir. 2000).
Jeffrey W. Eisinger v. Fed. Labor Relations Auth., 218 F.3d 1097 (Fed. Cir. 2000). “Although Eisinger’s response conceded that he lacked standing under FLRA regulations, he argued that the statutory language of 5 U.S.C. § 7111 (b)(2) permits “any person” to file a petition and that § 7103(a)(1) defines a person as “an indi *1100 vidual, labor organization, or…”
Stilley v. McBride, 965 S.W.2d 125 (Ark. 1998). “” 2 Under 5 U.S.C. § 7111 (a), the Labor Statute requires an agency to accord exclusive recognition to a labor union that is elected by employees to serve as the representative of a bargaining unit.”
Nat'l Treasury Employees Union v. Fed. Labor Relations Auth., 691 F.2d 553 (D.C. Cir. 1982). “Brief for Petitioner at 2; see 5 U.S.C. § 7111 (Supp. IV 1980). The Bureau is responsible generally for the issuance of government securities to the public.”
Am. Fed'n of Gov't Employees, Afl-Cio, Local 2953 v. Fed. Labor Relations Auth., 730 F.2d 1534 (D.C. Cir. 1984). “A labor organization securing the majority support of employees within an appropriate bargaining unit is accorded the status of exclusive bargaining representative of the employees in that unit, 5 U.S.C. § 7111 (d), and as exclusive representative, is entitled to represent, and…”
Commc'ns Workers of Am. v. Ector Cnty. Hosp. Dist., 467 F.3d 427 (5th Cir. 2006). “, 5 U.S.C. §§ 7111 , 7114, 7116. Cf. Scott v.”
California Nat'l Guard, & Dep't of Def., Petitioners/cross-Respondents v. Fed. Labor Relations Auth., Respondent/cross-Petitioner, 697 F.2d 874 (9th Cir. 1983). “5 U.S.C. § 7111 (a). Thereupon, the agency and union have a duty to meet and negotiate in good faith for the purpose of arriving at a collective bargaining agreement.”
Am. Fed'n of Gov't Employees, Afl-Cio, Local 2441 v. Fed. Labor Relations Auth., 864 F.2d 178 (D.C. Cir. 1988). “Once employees in a unit of the federal government have chosen by majority vote to be represented by a particular labor organization, that labor organization becomes the exclusive bargaining representative of the unit employees.”
Curtis v. United States, 59 Fed. Cl. 543 (Fed. Cl. 2004). “” 5 U.S.C. § 7111 (a). A union that has been accorded exclusive recognition “is entitled to act for, and negotiate collective bargaining agreements covering, all employees in the unit.”
Julian W. Burke v. United States Postal Serv., 888 F.2d 833 (Fed. Cir. 1989). “As is clear from the language of 5 U.S.C. § 7111 (1988), and implicit in the reasoning adopted by this court in Bacashihua v.”
Baird v. HOLWAY, 539 F. Supp. 2d 79 (D.D.C. 2008). “Defendants have indicated that they filed that petition pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 7111 (b)(2), which permits a party to seek “clarification of, or an amendment to, a certification then in effect or a matter relating to representation.”
Jaynes v. United States, 75 Fed. Cl. 218 (Fed. Cl. 2007). “An “exclusive representative” is defined as any labor organization which “is certified as the exclusive representative of employees in an appropriate unit pursuant to [ 5 U.S.C. § 7111 ].” 5 U.S.C. § 7103 (a)(16).”
Walter A. Warren v. Local 1759, Am. Fed'n of Gov't Employees, 764 F.2d 1395 (11th Cir. 1985). “He contends that the judicially enforceable duty of fair representation arises out of 5 U.S.C. § 7111 (Congress’ grant of exclusive representation) and not out of the explicit provision of 5 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.