5 U.S.C. § 7114
Representation rights and duties
Section effective 90 days after
Subsec. (a)(1) and (4) of this section suspended with respect to any matter proposed for bargaining which would substantially impair the implementation by the United States Forces of any treaty or agreement, including any minutes or understandings thereto, between the United States and the Government of the host nation, see section 1(b) of Ex. Ord. No. 12391,
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 236
cases (26 in the last 5 years), 1981–2026 · leading case: Am. Fed'n of Gov't Employees v. Fed. Labor Relations Auth., 836 F.3d 1291 (10th Cir. 2016).
Am. Fed'n of Gov't Employees v. Fed. Labor Relations Auth., 836 F.3d 1291 (10th Cir. 2016). “5 U.S.C. § 7114 (a)(2). C. Administrative Proceedings 5 The Union filed an unfair-labor-practice charge against Hill Air Force Base, asserting that Hill violated § 7114(a)(2)(B) by denying Ptacek’s request for union representation during the interview by AFOSI, which allegedly…”
United States Dep't of Def. v. Fed. Labor Relations Auth., 510 U.S. 487 (1994). “" 5 U. S. C. § 7114 (b)(4). Disclosure of the home addresses is prohibited by the Privacy Act unless an exception to that Act applies.”
Nat'l Fed'n of Fed. Employees, Local 1309 v. Dep't of the Interior, 526 U.S. 86 (1999). “" 5 U. S. C. § 7114 (a)(4). We here consider whether that duty to bargain extends to a clause proposed by a union that would bind the parties to bargain midtermthat is, while the basic comprehensive labor contract is in effectabout subjects not included in that basic contract.”
Nat'l Treasury Employees Union v. Fed. Labor Relations Auth., 754 F.3d 1031 (D.C. Cir. 2014). “5 U.S.C. § 7114 (a)(2)(B). The FLRA determined that covered IRS personnel are not entitled to union representation at suitability interviews conducted by OPM investigators because OPM investigators do not act as “representatives” of the IRS during the interviews.”
Am. Fed'n of Gov't Emps. v. Trump, 318 F. Supp. 3d 370 (D.C. Cir. 2018). “]" 5 U.S.C. § 7114 (b)(1)-(2). In addition, the parties must "participate actively in the deliberations so as to indicate a present intention to find a basis for agreement"; maintain "an open mind"; and make "a sincere effort .”
Nat'l Treasury Employees Union v. Fed. Labor Relations Auth., 774 F.2d 1181 (D.C. Cir. 1985). “(2)(A) provides: An exclusive representative of an appropriate unit in an agency shall be given the opportunity to be represented at— (A) any formal discussion between one or more representatives of the agency and one or more employees in the unit or their representatives…”
Karahalios v. Nat'l Fed'n of Fed. Employees, Local 1263, 489 U.S. 527 (1989). “Of particular relevance here, 5 U. S. C. § 7114 (a)(1) provides that a labor organization that has been accorded the exclusive right of representing employees in a designated unit “is responsible for representing the interests of all employees in the unit it represents without…”
Fort Stewart Schs. v. Fed. Labor Relations Auth., 495 U.S. 641 (1990). “II The FSLMRS requires a federal agency to negotiate in good faith with the chosen representative of employees covered by the Statute, 5 U. S. C. § 7114 (a)(4), and makes it an unfair labor practice to refuse to do so, § 7116(a)(5).”
Am. Fed'n of Gov't Employees, Afl-Cio v. Fed. Labor Relations Auth., 778 F.2d 850 (D.C. Cir. 1985). “5 U.S.C. § 7114 provides that (c)(1) An agreement between any agency and an exclusive representative shall be subject to approval by the head of the agency.”
Montana Air Chapter No. 29, Ass'n of Civilian Technicians, Inc. v. Fed. Labor Relations Auth., 898 F.2d 753 (9th Cir. 1990). “In April 1981, the National Guard Bureau approved the agreement pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 7114 (c). In April 1985, the union and the Adjutant General executed a new labor agreement.”
Gutierrez v. Flores, 543 F.3d 248 (5th Cir. 2008). “The Court noted that 5 U.S.C. § 7114 (a)(1) creates a duty of fair representation for labor organizations.”
Ass'n of Civilian Technicians, Montana Air Chapter No. 29 v. Fed. Labor Relations Auth., 22 F.3d 1150 (D.C. Cir. 1994). “When the Agreement was presented for review to the head of the National Guard Bureau (“Agency”), the Agency head disapproved the agreement, inter alia, on the basis that the clause pertaining to civilian attire violated “applicable law,” 5 U.S.C. § 7114 (c)(2), because it…”
— 5 U.S.C. § 7114(a)(1) — 1 case
Sedwick v. McDonald (N.D. Tex. 2025).
— 5 U.S.C. § 7114(a)(4) — 1 case
Nat'l Treasury Employees Union v. Fed. Labor Relations Auth., 414 F.3d 50 (D.C. Cir. 2005).
— 5 U.S.C. § 7114(b)(4) — 1 case
United States Dep't of Health & Human Servs. v. Fed. Labor Relations Auth., 833 F.2d 1129 (4th Cir. 1987).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.