5 U.S.C. § 7533
Effect on other statutes
This subchapter does not impair the powers vested in the Atomic Energy Commission by chapter 23 of title 42, or the requirement in section 2201(d) of title 42 that adequate provision be made for administrative review of a determination to dismiss an employee of the Atomic Energy Commission.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 1987–1988 · leading case: Carlucci v. Doe, 488 U.S. 93 (1988).
Carlucci v. Doe, 488 U.S. 93 (1988). “4 The Court of Appeals also noted that 5 U. S. C. §7533 provides that § 7532 does not “impair the powers vested in the Atomic Energy Commission [AEC] — or the requirement — that adequate provision be made for administrative review” of a termination by that Agency, yet does omit…”
John Doe v. Caspar Weinberger, Sec'y, Dep't of Def., 820 F.2d 1275 (D.C. Cir. 1987). “See 5 U.S.C. § 7533 . But Congress did not provide any equivalent provision for any other agency covered by § 7532.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.