5 U.S.C. § 803

Special rule on statutory, regulatory, and judicial deadlines

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 5 CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) In the case of any deadline for, relating to, or involving any rule which does not take effect (or the effectiveness of which is terminated) because of enactment of a joint resolution under section 802, that deadline is extended until the date 1 year after the date of enactment of the joint resolution. Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to affect a deadline merely by reason of the postponement of a rule’s effective date under section 801(a).(b) The term “deadline” means any date certain for fulfilling any obligation or exercising any authority established by or under any Federal statute or regulation, or by or under any court order implementing any Federal statute or regulation.(Added Pub. L. 104–121, title II, § 251, Mar. 29, 1996, 110 Stat. 873.)

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 1 case, 1957–1957 · leading case: John J. McGinty v. Herbert Brownell, Jr., Attorney Gen. of the United States, 249 F.2d 124 (D.C. Cir. 1957).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

John J. McGinty v. Herbert Brownell, Jr., Attorney Gen. of the United States, 249 F.2d 124 (D.C. Cir. 1957). “390 (1944), 5 U.S.C.A. § 803 : “No permanent or indefinite preference eligible * * * shall bo discharged * * * except for such cause as will promote the efficiency of the service and for reasons given in writing, and the person whose discharge * * * is sought shall have at least…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.