50 U.S.C. § 3002

Congressional declaration of purpose

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 50 CasesGoogle Scholar

In enacting this chapter, it is the intent of Congress to provide a comprehensive program for the future security of the United States; to provide for the establishment of integrated policies and procedures for the departments, agencies, and functions of the Government relating to the national security; to provide a Department of Defense, including the three military Departments of the Army, the Navy (including naval aviation and the United States Marine Corps), and the Air Force under the direction, authority, and control of the Secretary of Defense; to provide that each military department shall be separately organized under its own Secretary and shall function under the direction, authority, and control of the Secretary of Defense; to provide for their unified direction under civilian control of the Secretary of Defense but not to merge these departments or services; to provide for the establishment of unified or specified combatant commands, and a clear and direct line of command to such commands; to eliminate unnecessary duplication in the Department of Defense, and particularly in the field of research and engineering by vesting its overall direction and control in the Secretary of Defense; to provide more effective, efficient, and economical administration in the Department of Defense; to provide for the unified strategic direction of the combatant forces, for their operation under unified command, and for their integration into an efficient team of land, naval, and air forces but not to establish a single Chief of Staff over the armed forces nor an overall armed forces general staff.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case (1 in the last 5 years), 2025–2025 · leading case: Prutehi Litekyan: Save Ritidian v. United States Dep't of the Air Force, 128 F.4th 1089 (9th Cir. 2025).
Prutehi Litekyan: Save Ritidian v. United States Dep't of the Air Force, 128 F.4th 1089 (9th Cir. 2025). “See 50 U.S.C. § 3002 ; 10 U.S.C. § 9062 (c). It is NEPA that requires the Air Force to incorporate environmental considerations into its decisionmaking process, not the statutes that govern its principal operations.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.