Notes of Decisions
Heejoon Chung v. U.S. Bank, N.A., 250 F. Supp. 3d 658 (D. Haw. 2017).
· cites it 2× “§ 101 (d)(1); 50 U.S.C. § 3911 . The term “period of military service” means “the period beginning on the date on which a servicemem-ber enters military service and ending on the date on which the servicemember is released from military service or dies while in military service.”
Michael Davis v. City of Philadelphia, 821 F.3d 484 (3d Cir. 2016).
· cites it 2× “” 50 U.S.C. § 3911 (1). Although the parties view this case purely in terms of standing, we see it somewhat differently.”
Doe v. City of Duncan, 789 S.E.2d 602 (S.C. Ct. App. 2016).
“See 50 U.S.C. § 3911 (2), (defining “military service” as “active duty”); Boone v.”
Kimball v. Orlans Assocs. P.C., 651 F. App'x 477 (6th Cir. 2016).
“While Tracy, as Richard’s wife, qualifies as a dependent, 50 U.S.C. § 3911 (4)(A), the district court considered her claims along with Richard’s.”
Hammack v. N.M. Taxation & Revenue Dep't, No. 34,432 (N.M. Ct. App. May 1, 2017).
· cites it 5× “§ 571(b) (2012) of the Servicemembers 11 Civil Relief Act (SCRA), which are now codified as 50 U.S.C. § 3911 (1), (2) (2015), 12 and 50 U.”
Davis v. City of Albuquerque, No. 1:25-cv-00167 (D.N.M. Apr. 1, 2025).
· cites it 4× “His full-time New Mexico Army National Guard service is not considered “active duty” under 50 U.S.C. § 3911 (2) because that term “does not include full-time National Guard duty,” 10 U.”
Davis v. City of Albuquerque, No. 1:25-cv-00167 (D.N.M. Mar. 13, 2025).
· cites it 2× “His full-time New Mexico Army National Guard service is not considered “active duty” under 50 U.S.C. § 3911 (2) because that term “does not include full-time National Guard duty,” 10 U.”
Nancy Spratt v. Donald Bishop, No. M2015-01352-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. July 19, 2016).
“” 50 U.S.C. § 3911 (1) (emphasis added). Moreover, the SCRA has been held to be inapplicable to immediate family members.”
Kwon v. Santander Consum. USA, No. 17-1332-cv (2d Cir. July 24, 2018).
“; the Servicemember’s Civil Relief Act of 2003 (“SCRA”), 50 U.S.C. § 3911 et seq.; New York General Obligations Law §§ 5-511, 5-513; and New York General Business Law § 349; and also brought state law breach of contract, emotional distress, and pain and suffering claims.”
Pearson v. United States, No. 16-1250 (Fed. Cl. Sept. 6, 2018).
“” 50 U.S.C. § 3911 . Reversing the trial court, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held that the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act “did not toll the six-year statute of limitations .”
In re Order Amending Rules 209, 304, 403, 410, 503, 515, & 516 of the PA Rules of Civil Procedure Governing Actions & Proceedings Before Magisterial Dist. Judges, No. 442 Magisterial Rules Docket (Pa. Apr. 17, 2020).
“” See 50 U.S.C. § 3911 (5). However, current procedural rules for the magisterial district courts do not address attaching an affidavit regarding military service to the complaint, request for entry of judgment, or request for order of possession.”
50 U.S.C. § 3911(5): 1 case
50 U.S.C. § 3911(9): 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.