50 U.S.C. § 413
Transferred
[transferred]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 12
cases, 1982–2008 · leading case: Brown v. Socialist Workers '74 Campaign Comm. (Ohio), 459 U.S. 87 (1982).
Brown v. Socialist Workers '74 Campaign Comm. (Ohio), 459 U.S. 87 (1982). “3-4 (1976), and Congress has since instituted more rigorous oversight of FBI and other intelligence activities, see 50 U. S. C. § 413 (1976 ed., Supp. IV). An inference from these two incidents that disclosure of recipients of expenditures would increase any difficulty the party…”
Javier Sanchez-Espinoza v. Ronald Wilson Reagan, President of the United States, 770 F.2d 202 (D.C. Cir. 1985). “1985), the Hughes-Ryan Amendment, 50 U.S.C. § 413 (1982), 10 and the National Security Act of 1947, 61 Stat.”
In Re Nat'l Sec. Agency Telecomm. Records Litig., 564 F. Supp. 2d 1109 (N.D. Cal. 2008). “50 USC §§ 413 (a), 413b(c). Congress left the executive branch no “authority to withhold information from the intelligence committees on the grounds that providing the information to the intelligence committees would constitute the unauthorized disclosure of classified…”
In Re Sealed Case (Three Cases), 838 F.2d 476 (D.C. Cir. 1988). “The Attorney General has the authority to determine whether information initially received is "sufficient to constitute grounds to investigate,” § 592(a)(1), and following a preliminary investigation, whether “further investigation or prosecution is warranted.”
United States v. Poindexter, 725 F. Supp. 13 (D.D.C. 1989). “18 Third, Congress made it clear by enactment of the Hughes-Ryan Amendment, 50 U.S.C. § 413 , which imposes substantial reporting requirements on the Executive Branch relating to intelligence activities, that it expects Executive officials to tell the truth when reporting to…”
Sanchez-Espinoza v. Reagan, 568 F. Supp. 596 (D.D.C. 1983). “), especially the Hughes-Ryan Amendment ( 50 U.S.C. § 413 , which requires certain reports to be made to Congress about U.”
Doe v. Casey, 601 F. Supp. 581 (D.D.C. 1985). “Further, pursuant to 50 U.S.C. § 413 , the DCI is required to keep the congressional intelligence committees fully and currently informed on all intelligence matters.”
Dellums v. Smith, 577 F. Supp. 1449 (N.D. Cal. 1984). “§ 2422 , and the Intelligence Authorization Act of Fiscal Year 1981, 50 U.S.C. § 413 . These statutes do require reports to Congress on certain intelligence activities.”
United States v. North, 708 F. Supp. 380 (D.D.C. 1988). “50 U.S.C. § 413 (b). 4 More generally, congressional committees act well within their authority when they seek explanation from Executive Branch officials regarding matters that may affect substantive legislative decisions.”
Investigative Auth. of the Gen. Acct. Off. (OLC 1988). “4 This intelligence oversight system has been codified at 50 U.S.C. § 413 . That section sets forth requirements for the Director of Central Intelligence, the heads of all other federal agencies involved in intelligence activities, and the President to inform the Congress…”
The President's Compliance with the \Timely Notification\" Requirement of Section 501(b) of the Nat'l Sec. Act" (OLC 1986). “50 U.S.C. § 413 (a) (emphasis added). For situations in which the President fails to give prior notice under § 501(a), § 501(b) provides: The President shall fully inform the intelligence committees in a timely fashion of intelligence operations in foreign coun tries, other…”
Application of the Neutrality Act to Off. Gov't Activities (OLC 1984). “50 U.S.C § 413(a), (b). 28 The Boland A m endm ent to the Act, Pub.”
— 50 U.S.C. § 413(a) — 1 case
Application of the Neutrality Act to Off. Gov't Activities (OLC 1984). “50 U.S.C § 413(a), (b). 28 The Boland A m endm ent to the Act, Pub.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.