50 U.S.C. § 421
Transferred
[transferred]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 19
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1982–2025 · leading case: Alvarado v. KOB-TV, L.L.C., 493 F.3d 1210 (10th Cir. 2007).
Alvarado v. KOB-TV, L.L.C., 493 F.3d 1210 (10th Cir. 2007). “Alvarado and Flores point to a federal law, 50 U.S.C. § 421 , that criminalizes disclosure of the identity of covert intelligence agents as support for a policy exception for undercover officers generally.”
Wilson v. Libby, 535 F.3d 697 (D.C. Cir. 2008). “See 50 U.S.C. § 421 . And the doctrine of Totten , which precludes suits "against the Government based on covert espionage agreements," Tenet v.”
Wilson v. Cent. Intelligence Agency, 586 F.3d 171 (2d Cir. 2009). “See 50 U.S.C. § 421 . As a consequence, the Agency "rolled back" Ms.”
Bismullah v. Gates, 501 F.3d 178 (D.C. Cir. 2007). “Exhibit A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING REGARDING ACCESS TO CLASSIFIED NATIONAL SECURITY INFORMATION Having familiarized myself with the applicable statutes, regulations, and orders related to, but not limited to, unauthorized disclosure of classified information, espionage and…”
In re Grand Jury Subpoena, Miller, 438 F.3d 1141 (D.C. Cir. 2005). “, 50 U.S.C. § 421 (criminalizing, inter alia, disclosure of the identity of a covert agent by anyone having had authorized access to classified information).”
Adele Halkin v. Richard Helms, Dep't of State, 690 F.2d 977 (D.C. Cir. 1982). “122 (June 23, 1982), to be codified at 50 U.S.C. §§ 421 -26, it is a defense to the felony offenses defined by that Act that “the United States had publicly acknowledged or revealed the intelligence relationship to the United States of the individual the disclosure of whose…”
In Re Grand Jury Subpoena, Miller, 438 F.3d 1138 (D.C. Cir. 2005). “, 50 U.S.C. § 421 (criminalizing, inter alia, disclosure of the identity of a covert agent by anyone having had authorized access to classified information).”
United States v. Jeffrey Sterling, 724 F.3d 482 (4th Cir. 2013). “Indeed, Congress has criminalized such disclosure, see 50 U.S.C. § 421 , given the “behavior’s ‘intolerable’ consequences: ‘[t]he loss of vital human intelligence which our policymakers need, the great cost to the American taxpayer of replacing intelligence resources lost due to…”
United States v. Abu Marzook, 412 F. Supp. 2d 913 (N.D. Ill. 2006). “See 50 U.S.C. § 421 (a). Under Israeli law, the true identities of these agents — -including their names, identifying information, and physical characteristics — are classified.”
In re Grand Jury Subpoena Miller, 397 F.3d 964 (D.C. Cir. 2005). “, 50 U.S.C. § 421 (criminalizing, inter alia, disclosure of the identity of a covert agent by anyone having had authorized access to classified information).”
In Re Guantanamo Bay Detainee Litig., 577 F. Supp. 2d 143 (D.D.C. 2010). “MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING REGARDING ACCESS TO CLASSIFIED NATIONAL SECURITY INFORMATION Having familiarized myself with the applicable statutes, regulations, and orders related to, but not limited to, unauthorized disclosure of classified information, espionage and related…”
In Re Guantanamo Detainee Cases, 344 F. Supp. 2d 174 (D.D.C. 2004). “Exhibit B MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING REGARDING ACCESS TO CLASSIFIED NATIONAL SECURITY INFORMATION Having familiarized myself with the applicable statutes, regulations, and orders related to, but not limited to, unauthorized disclosure of classified information, espionage and…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.