50 U.S.C. § 431
Transferred
[transferred]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 31
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1985–2024 · leading case: Morley v. Cent. Intelligence Agency, 508 F.3d 1108 (D.C. Cir. 2007).
Morley v. Cent. Intelligence Agency, 508 F.3d 1108 (D.C. Cir. 2007). “We hold that Morley met his burden to show that his request falls within an exception to the Central Intelligence Agency Information Act of 1984 (“CIA Act”), 50 U.S.C. § 431 (c)(3), and we remand the case so that the CIA may search its operational files in response to Morley’s…”
Cent. Intelligence Agency v. Sims, 471 U.S. 159 (1985). “2209 , 50 U. S. C. § 431 (1982 ed., Supp. III) (exempting the Agency's operational files from disclosure under FOIA).”
Morley v. Cent. Intelligence Agency, 894 F.3d 389 (D.C. Cir. 2018). “See 50 U.S.C. § 431 (b). Typically, operational files are exempt from FOIA requests.”
Sherry Ann Sullivan v. Cent. Intelligence Agency, 992 F.2d 1249 (1st Cir. 1993). “THE FOIA CLAIM We begin by exploring the intersection between FOIA and the CIA Information Act of 1984, 50 U.S.C. §§ 431 ^32 (1988). We then apply the statutory framework to the case at bar.”
Am. Civil Liberties Union v. Dep't of Def., 351 F. Supp. 2d 265 (S.D.N.Y. 2005). “ked to apply a seldom construed statute: the CIA Information Act (the “Act”), which both authorizes the “Director of the Central Intelligence Agency, with the coordination of the Director of National Intelligence,” 1 to exempt the CIA’s “operational files” from “publication or…”
Inst. for Policy Studies v. United States Cent. Intelligence Agency, 885 F. Supp. 2d 120 (D.D.C. 2012). “50 U.S.C. § 431 . In order for a file to be an “operational file” within the meaning of the CIA Information Act of 1984, the files must fall into one of three categories to be exempted: (1) files of the Directorate of Operations 1 which document the conduct of foreign…”
Wolf v. Cent. Intelligence Agency, 569 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D.D.C. 2008). “” 50 U.S.C. § 431 (a). The CIA has designated certain files within the Directorate of Operations (now NCS), the Directorate for Science and Technology (“DS & T”), and the Office of Personnel Security (now the Office of Security (“OS”)) as “operational files.”
Students Against Genocide v. Dep't of State, 257 F.3d 828 (D.C. Cir. 2001). “As the government notes, however, we need not consider SAGE's challenge to the applicability of that Act because the agency invoked the National Security Act for the same photographs.”
Davy v. Cent. Intelligence Agency, 357 F. Supp. 2d 76 (D.D.C. 2004). “” 50 U.S.C. § 431 (a). “Operational files” are defined to include “the files of the Directorate of Operations which document the conduct of foreign intelligence or counterintelligence operations or intelligence or security liaison arrangements or information exchanges with…”
Joe Hunt v. Cent. Intelligence Agency, 981 F.2d 1116 (9th Cir. 1992). “The court also held that under the Central Intelligence Agency Information Act (“CIA Information Act”), 50 U.S.C. § 431 , the CIA can refuse to confirm or deny the existence of records only when the information would relate to covert actions.”
Church of Scientology of California v. Internal Revenue Serv., 792 F.2d 153 (D.C. Cir. 1986). “For most information possessed by the government, Congress has determined that the risk of occasional unknowing disclosure of facts entitled to be withheld under FOIA is outweighed by the benefits of openness.”
Morley v. United States Cent. Intelligence Agency, 699 F. Supp. 2d 244 (D.D.C. 2010). “On August 6, 2008, the agency produced to Morley 293 documents found in these new searches; 29 of these documents were released in full and 264 were redacted in part.”
— 50 U.S.C. § 431(a) — 1 case
Looks Filmproduktionen Gmbh v. Cent. Intelligence Agency, 199 F. Supp. 3d 153 (D.D.C. 2016).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.