50 U.S.C. § 571
Repealed. Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, § 53, 70A Stat. 641
[repealed]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8
cases, 1952–1956 · leading case: United States v. Doctor, 7 C.M.A. 126 (1956).
United States v. Doctor, 7 C.M.A. 126 (1956). “He was offered an opportunity to accept punishment under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 50 USC § 571 , and when he did not demand a court-martial, he was given a reprimand and fined $200.”
United States v. Hawthorne, 7 C.M.A. 293 (1956). “Under the Uniform Code of Military Justice and the Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, 1951, the commander having summary court-martial jurisdiction over the accused has substantial discretion to determine whether charges should be disposed of administratively or by…”
United States v. Wappler, 2 C.M.A. 393 (1953). “First, we observe that it is mentioned once only in the Code, supra — in Article 15 (a) (2) (F), 50 USC § 571 . There its imposition is authorized as a non-judicial punishment - by commanding officers, and is limited to “a person attached to or embarked in a vessel,” and to “a…”
Donnelly v. United States, 134 F. Supp. 635 (Ct. Cl. 1955). “Donnelly, and two other naval enlisted men, brought this action to recover damages which they claim resulted from certain allegedly unlawful proceedings taken against them by their commanding officer purporting to act under Article 15(d) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice,…”
United States v. Werthman, 5 C.M.A. 440 (1955). “The stat- ute of limitations does not bar prosecution for this type of offense under Article 15, 50 USC § 571 , or by a court-martial, until two years after its commission.”
United States v. Messenger, 2 C.M.A. 21 (1952). “have been disposed of under Article 15, 50 USC § 571 (Commanding officer’s non-judicial punishment).”
United States v. Benson, 3 C.M.A. 351 (1953). “Article 20 of the Code, 50 USC § 580 , authorizes a summary court-martial to impose restriction for a period of not more than two months and under Article 15, 50 USC § 571 , a commander authorized to administer non-judicial punishment may order an accused into restriction for…”
United States v. Robinson, 4 C.M.A. 488 (1954). “He was punished under Article 15 of the Code, 50 USC § 571 , and his pass privileges were revoked.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.