50 U.S.C. § 740
Omitted
[omitted]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 13
cases, 1950–1976 · leading case: Boruski v. United States, 155 F. Supp. 320 (Ct. Cl. 1957).
Boruski v. United States, 155 F. Supp. 320 (Ct. Cl. 1957). “lowances and other benefits to which plaintiff would otherwise have been entitled from the date of the execution of a court-martial conviction and sentence for manslaughter on July 23, 1945, to August 28, 1951, the date that sentence was vacated by the Judge Advocate General of…”
Boruski v. Stewart, 381 F. Supp. 529 (S.D.N.Y. 1974). “Accordingly, on August 28, 1951, the sentence of dismissal was vacated and replaced by an administrative discharge, honorable in nature, pursuant to 50 U.S.C. § 740 , under the decision of the Judge Advocate General, (footnote omitted) The honorable discharge, however, bore the…”
Leon B. Rushing v. Frederick T. Wilkinson, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Atlanta, Georgia, 272 F.2d 633 (5th Cir. 1959). “50 U.S.C.A. § 740 . I. The appellant argues that he was denied effective assistance of counsel in violation of the Sixth Amendment, and, interrelated with this denial of adequate counsel, he was not afforded an opportunity to prepare the defense of his case, contrary to due…”
Burns v. Lovett, Sec'y of Def. Dennis v. Lovett, Sec'y of Def., 202 F.2d 335 (D.C. Cir. 1952). “147 (1950), 50 U.S.C.A. § 740 . 34 . 41 Stat. 789 (1920), 10 U.”
Ernest F. Boruski, Jr. v. United States Gov't, 493 F.2d 301 (2d Cir. 1974). “Accordingly, on August 28, 1951, the sentence of dismissal was vacated and replaced by an administrative discharge, honorable in nature, pursuant to 50 U. S.C. § 740, 4 under the decision of the Judge Advocate General.”
Goldstein v. Johnson, Sec'y of Def., 184 F.2d 342 (D.C. Cir. 1950). “147 , 50 U.S.C.A. § 740 , as made effective by § 5 of the act.”
Dennis v. Lovett, 104 F. Supp. 310 (D.D.C. 1952). “Thereafter, upon the application of petitioner for relief provided -by Section 12, Act of May 5, 1950, 50 U.S.C.A. § 740 (formerly Article of War 53), the Judge Advocate General, United States Air Force, caused a board of officers to be appointed to provide for a hearing, which…”
United States v. Corbin, 3 C.M.A. 99 (1953). “On November 28, 1952, The Judge Advocate General, United States Navy, acting upon application of accused for relief under Section 12 of the Act of May 5, 1950, 64 Stat 107, 50 USC § 740 , reduced the murder conviction to a finding of guilty of the lesser included offense of…”
White v. Humphrey, 115 F. Supp. 317 (M.D. Penn. 1953). “Action by the Judge Advocate General upon petition of defendant for relief under Section 12, Act of May 5, 1950, 50 U.S.C.A. § 740 , Respondent’s Exhibit B.”
Lee v. Madigan, 148 F. Supp. 23 (N.D. Cal. 1957). “Article of War 53 (now superseded by 50 U.S.C.A. § 740 ). The Judge Advocate General of any of the Armed Forces is authorized “in his discretion to grant a new trial, or to vacate a sentence, * * in any court-martial case in which application is made within one year after final…”
Boruski v. U. S. Gov't, 70 F.R.D. 553 (D. Mass. 1976). “Accordingly, on August 28, 1951 the sentence of dismissal was vacated and replaced by an administrative discharge, honorable in nature, pursuant to 50 U.S.C. § 740 under the decision of the Judge Advocate General.”
Dennis v. Taylor, 150 F. Supp. 597 (M.D. Penn. 1957). “6 Subsequently, upon application of Calvin Dennis for relief under Section 12, Act of May 5,1950, 50 U.S.C.A. § 740 (formerly Article of War 53), a Board of Officers was appointed, which, on the request of counsel for petitioner, heard oral argument 7 and the issues now raised…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.