50 U.S.C. § 781
Repealed. Pub. L. 103–199, title VIII, § 803(1), Dec. 17, 1993, 107 Stat. 2329
[repealed]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 99
cases, 1950–2011 · leading case: Communist Party of United States v. Subversive Activities Control Bd., 367 U.S. 1 (1961).
Communist Party of United States v. Subversive Activities Control Bd., 367 U.S. 1 (1961). “987 , 50 U. S. C. § 781 et seq. It has been amended, principally by the Communist Control Act of 1954, 68 Stat.”
Aptheker v. Sec'y of State, 378 U.S. 500 (1964). “987 , 50 U. S. C. § 781 (1). The provision therefore sweeps within its prohibition both knowing and unknowing members.”
Ullmann v. United States, 350 U.S. 422 (1956). “987 , 50 U. S. C. § 781 , to be employed by the United States, to be employed in any defense facility, to hold office or employment with any labor organization, § 5 (a) (1), or to apply for a passport or to use a passport.”
Pennsylvania v. Nelson, 350 U.S. 497 (1956). “[12] 50 U. S. C. § 781 et seq. [13] Id., § 782 (3), (4).”
Kent v. Dulles, 357 U.S. 116 (1958). “987 , 993, 50 U. S. C. §§ 781 , 785, provide that it shall be unlawful, when a Communist organization is registered under the Act or when "there is in effect a final order of the Board requiring an organization to register," for any member having knowledge of such registry and…”
Eastland v. United States Servicemen's Fund, 421 U.S. 491 (1975). “Finally, he noted that the prime purpose of the Subcommittee's inquiry was to investigate application of the Internal Security Act of 1950, 50 U. S. C. § 781 et seq., and that, too, provided a legitimate congressional interest.”
United States v. Brown, 381 U.S. 437 (1965). “987 , 50 U. S. C. § 781 et seq. (1958 ed.). The definition of "Communist-action organization" which the Board is to apply is set forth in § 3 of the Act: "[A]ny organization in the United States .”
Scales v. United States, 367 U.S. 203 (1961). “987 , *207 50 U. S. C. § 781 et seq., constitutes a pro tanto repeal of the membership clause of the Smith Act by excluding from the reach of that clause membership in any Communist organization.”
City of Portland v. Tidyman, 759 P.2d 242 (Or. 1988). “50 U.S.C. § 781 et seq. Beyond statutes passed in apprehension of danger from offensive expression, Dean Calabresi has written more generally: "[Some] laws no longer served current needs or represented current majorities.”
Schoenman v. Fed. Bureau of Investigation, 763 F. Supp. 2d 173 (D.D.C. 2011). “§ 2387, and the Internal Security Act of 1950, 50 U.S.C. § 781 , as the statutory authority for these law enforcement activities.”
Elfbrandt v. Russell, 384 U.S. 11 (1966). “[2] See the findings of Congress, Subversive Activities Control Act of 1950, 50 U. S. C. § 781 (1964 ed.), and of the Arizona Legislature, Arizona Communist Control Act of 1961, Ariz.”
Black v. Cutter Labs., 278 P.2d 905 (Cal. 1955). “987; 50 U.S.C.A. §781 ) : “As a result of evidence adduced before various committees of the Senate and House of Representatives, the Congress finds that— “(1) There exists a world Communist movement which in its origins, its development, and its present practice, is a world-wide…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.