U.S. Code » Title 51 » Subtitle Subtitle II— General Program and Policy Provisions › Chapter CHAPTER 201— NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE PROGRAM › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER III— GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISIONS

51 U.S.C. § 20137

Malpractice and negligence suits against United States

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 51 CasesGoogle Scholar
(a)Exclusive Remedy.—The remedy against the United States provided by sections 1346(b) and 2672 of title 28, for damages for personal injury, including death, caused by the negligent or wrongful act or omission of any physician, dentist, nurse, pharmacist, or paramedical or other supporting personnel (including medical and dental technicians, nursing assistants, and therapists) of the Administration in the performance of medical, dental, or related health care functions (including clinical studies and investigations) while acting within the scope of such person’s duties or employment therein or therefor shall be exclusive of any other civil action or proceeding by reason of the same subject matter against such person (or the estate of such person) whose act or omission gave rise to the action or proceeding.(b)Attorney General To Defend any Civil Action or Proceeding for Malpractice or Negligence.—The Attorney General shall defend any civil action or proceeding brought in any court against any person referred to in subsection (a) (or the estate of such person) for any such injury. Any such person against whom such civil action or proceeding is brought shall deliver within such time after date of service or knowledge of service as determined by the Attorney General, all process served upon such person or an attested true copy thereof to such person’s immediate superior or to whomever was designated by the Administrator to receive such papers. Such person shall promptly furnish copies of the pleading and process therein to the United States Attorney for the district embracing the place wherein the proceeding is brought, to the Attorney General, and to the Administrator.(c)Removal of Actions.—Upon a certification by the Attorney General that any person described in subsection (a) was acting in the scope of such person’s duties or employment at the time of the incident out of which the suit arose, any such civil action or proceeding commenced in a State court shall be removed without bond at any time before trial by the Attorney General to the district court of the United States of the district and division embracing the place wherein it is pending and the proceeding deemed a tort action brought against the United States under the provisions of title 28, and all references thereto. Should a district court of the United States determine, on a hearing on a motion to remand held before a trial on the merits, that the case so removed is one in which a remedy by suit within the meaning of subsection (a) is not available against the United States, the case shall be remanded to the State court.(d)Compromise or Settlement of Claims.—The Attorney General may compromise or settle any claim asserted in such civil action or proceeding in the manner provided in section 2677 of title 28, and with the same effect.(e)Applicability of Other Provisions of Law.—For purposes of this section, the provisions of section 2680(h) of title 28 shall not apply to any cause of action arising out of a negligent or wrongful act or omission in the performance of medical, dental, or related health care functions (including clinical studies and investigations).(f)Liability Insurance for Persons Assigned to Foreign Countries or Non-Federal Agencies.—The Administrator or the Administrator’s designee may, to the extent that the Administrator or the designee deems appropriate, hold harmless or provide liability insurance for any person described in subsection (a) for damages for personal injury, including death, caused by such person’s negligent or wrongful act or omission in the performance of medical, dental, or related health care functions (including clinical studies and investigations) while acting within the scope of such person’s duties if such person is assigned to a foreign country or detailed for service with other than a Federal department, agency, or instrumentality or if the circumstances are such as are likely to preclude the remedies of third persons against the United States described in section 2679(b) of title 28, for such damage or injury.(Pub. L. 111–314, § 3, Dec. 18, 2010, 124 Stat. 3343.)

Historical and Revision Notes

Revised

Section

Source (U.S. Code)

Source (Statutes at Large)

20137

42 U.S.C. 2458a.

Pub. L. 85–568, title III, § 307, as added Pub. L. 94–464, § 3, Oct. 8, 1976, 90 Stat. 1988.

In subsection (a), the word “hereafter” is omitted as unnecessary.

In subsection (b), in the last sentence, commas are added after “brought” and “Attorney General” for clarity.

In subsection (e), the words “wrongful act or omission” are substituted for “wrongful act of omission” to correct an error in the law.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 12 cases (9 in the last 5 years), 2013–2025 · leading case: Levin v. United States, 568 U.S. 503 (2013).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Levin v. United States, 568 U.S. 503 (2013). · cites it 2× “”); 51 U. S. C. § 20137 (e) (“For purposes of this section, the provisions of [§ 2680(h)] shall not apply to any cause of action arising out of a negligent or wrongful act or omission in the performance of medical .”
Brignac v. United States, 239 F. Supp. 3d 1367 (N.D. Ga. 2017). “§ 1089 (a) (emphasis added); see also 51 U.S.C. § 20137 (a); 22 U.S.C. § 2702 (a); 38 U.”
Jones v. United States, No. 4:24-cv-04115 (D.S.D. Jan. 2, 2025). · cites it 5× “Jones sues the VA for medical malpractice under 51 U.S.C. § 20137 . Id. at 1, 3 . He seeks $150,000 in money damages for “[p]ain, suffering and loss of use” of his left leg Id.”
Davis v. Ennen Eye Ctr., No. 2:24-cv-02067 (W.D. Ark. Aug. 8, 2024). · cites it 4× “Plaintiffs identify 51 U.S.C. § 20137 as the source of law that supplies them with a federal cause of action.”
Bryant v. Blue Cross Blue Shield (BCBS)-Fed., No. 3:24-cv-00009 (S.D. Miss. May 7, 2024). · cites it 2× “Liberally construing Bryant’s Complaint, he asserts three claims: (1) a FEHBA claim seeking monetary damages for BCBSA’s denial of Regranex; (2) medical malpractice under 51 U.S.C. § 20137 ; and (3) state law negligence.”
Oliver III v. Hoffman Huffman, No. 1:23-cv-00010 (N.D. Ohio Mar. 14, 2023). · cites it 2× “In the Complaint, Plaintiff alleges he was admitted and discharged from multiple mental health treatment facilities in the Columbus, Ohio area from April to September 2019.”
Jackson v. Rosen, No. 2:20-cv-02842 (E.D. Pa. June 26, 2020). · cites it 2× “Second, Jackson alleges that Rosen was negligent in violation of 51 U.S.C. § 20137 . (Doc. No. 2 at p. 3.) That statute discusses the remedies available to a person injured by “the negligent or wrongful act or omission of any physician, dentist, nurse, pharmacist, or paramedical…”
Sorrell Jr. v. Michael E. DeBakey VA Med. Ctr., No. 4:23-cv-04840 (S.D. Tex. June 11, 2024). · cites it 2× “Sorrell’s complaint alleges that he is entitled to relief from the defendants under 51 U.S.C. § 20137 . (Docket Entry No. 1, p, 3).”
Freeman v. Robert Wood Johnson Hosp., No. 3:24-cv-08954 (D.N.J. Nov. 21, 2024). · cites it 2× “§ 2A:53A-27 and 51 U.S.C. § 20137 for lack of care, medical malpractice, and negligence against Defendant.”
Hirschfield v. U.S. Attorney's Off. for the Dist. of Columbia, No. 2023-3583 (D.D.C. Dec. 28, 2023). “§ 1592 and 51 U.S.C. § 20137 , plaintiff apparently alleges negligence on defendants’ part.”
Finnegan v. Columbia Doctors, No. 1:21-cv-06515 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 17, 2021). “Elizabeth Lee, both located in Manhattan, violated a federal statute governing medical malpractice claims brought against the United States, 51 U.S.C. § 20137 . Specifically, he alleges that in February 2021, he “consented to treatment with the defendant [who] then terminated…”
Smith v. Puget Sound Allergy, No. 3:21-cv-05169 (W.D. Wash. May 10, 2021). “Rather, they confer immunity on Department of Veterans Affairs 15 (“VA”) and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (“NASA”) medical personnel by 16 requiring patients injured by these personnel to recover from the United States under the Federal 17 Tort Claims Act…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.