Notes of Decisions
United States v. Ravneet Singh, 979 F.3d 697 (9th Cir. 2020).
· cites it 5× “SINGH 3 Rejecting appellants’ contention that Congress lacks the power to prohibit foreign nationals from donating and contributing to state and local elections, the panel held that Congress acted within its constitutional authority in enacting 52 U.S.C. § 30121 (a). Bound by…”
United States v. Kukushkin, 61 F.4th 327 (2d Cir. 2023).
· cites it 7× “) following a jury 4 trial where he was convicted of one count of conspiring to illegally donate 5 monies to a political campaign in violation of 52 U.S.C. §§ 30121 , 30122 and 18 6 U.S.C.”
Wendy Wagner v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 793 F.3d 1 (D.C. Cir. 2015).
“2011) (three-judge court) (upholding ban on contributions by foreign nationals, 52 U.S.C. § 30121 (a)), summ. aff'd, — U.”
Indep. Inst. v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 216 F. Supp. 3d 176 (D.D.C. 2016).
“]”); 52 U.S.C. § 30121 (a)(1)(C) (“It shall be unlawful for a foreign national, directly or indirectly to make an expenditure, independent expenditure, or disbursement for an electioneering communication!;.”
Citizens for Responsibility & Ethics in Wash. v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 316 F. Supp. 3d 349 (D.C. Cir. 2018).
“§ 510 (c) (prohibiting Presidential Inaugural Committee from "accept[ing] any donation from a foreign national") and 52 U.S.C. § 30121 (a) (making "unlawful for [ ] a foreign national, directly or indirectly, to make [ ] a contribution or donation of money or other thing of…”
United States v. Shen Zhen New World I, LLC, 115 F.4th 1167 (9th Cir. 2024).
“See 52 U.S.C. § 30121 . It is in the political-contributions context that the Government must prove that a defendant public official received a contribution “in return for an explicit promise or undertaking” to perform or not perform an official act.”
United States v. Jesse Benton, 98 F.4th 1119 (D.C. Cir. 2024).
“§ 371 (Count One); soliciting a contribution from a foreign national in violation of FECA, 52 U.S.C. § 30121 (Count Two); serving as a conduit for a FECA “contribution” in violation of 52 U.”
United States v. Ravneet Singh, 924 F.3d 1030 (9th Cir. 2019).
· cites it 5× “Rejecting appellants’ contention that Congress lacks the power to prohibit foreign nationals from donating and contributing to state and local elections, the panel held that Congress acted within its constitutional authority in enacting 52 U.S.C. § 30121 (a). Bound by the…”
United States v. Manafort, 314 F. Supp. 3d 258 (D.C. Cir. 2018).
“§§ 1956 and 1957 (money laundering and money laundering conspiracy); 52 U.S.C. §§ 30121 (a)(1)(A) and (a)(2) (foreign national contributions); and 18 U.”
United States v. Manafort, 323 F. Supp. 3d 795 (E.D. Va. 2018).
“§§ 1956 and 1957 (money laundering and money laundering conspiracy); 52 U.S.C. §§ 30121 (a)(1)(A) and (a)(2) (foreign national contributions); and 18 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.