54 U.S.C. § 100501

Areas included in System

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 54 CasesGoogle Scholar

The System shall include any area of land and water administered by the Secretary, acting through the Director, for park, monument, historic, parkway, recreational, or other purposes.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases (4 in the last 5 years), 2017–2024 · leading case: United States Forest Serv. v. Cowpasture River Pres. Assn., 140 S. Ct. 1837 (2020).
United States Forest Serv. v. Cowpasture River Pres. Assn., 140 S. Ct. 1837 (2020). · cites it 8× “" 54 U.S.C. § 100501 . Because it concluded the Trail was now within the National Park System, the court held that the Trail was beyond the authority of "the Secretary of the Interior or appropriate agency head" to grant pipeline rights-of-way under the Leasing Act.”
John Sturgeon v. Sue Masica, 872 F.3d 927 (9th Cir. 2017). · cites it 2× “See 54 U.S.C. § 100501 . “Alaska is different.”
Cowpasture River Pres. v. Forest Serv., 911 F.3d 150 (4th Cir. 2018). “54 U.S.C. § 100501 . Congress designated the ANST as a National Scenic Trail administered by the Secretary of the Interior, who delegated that duty to NPS.”
Gordon Price v. Merrick Garland, 45 F.4th 1059 (D.C. Cir. 2022). “”); see also 54 U.S.C. § 100501 (Permit Regime applies to “any area of land and water administered by the Secretary [of the Interior], acting through the Director [of the NPS], for park, monument, historic, parkway, recreational, or other purposes.”
Price v. Barr (D.D.C. 2021). · cites it 2× “” 54 U.S.C. § 100501 . The scope of § 100905’s permitting regime, therefore, necessarily covers multiple locations that courts have already identified as traditional public forums.”
Lunsford v. US Nat'l Park Serv. (D. Utah 2024). “. .”13 Beyond this command, Congress remarked that its intent in creating GLCA was “to provide for public outdoor recreation use and enjoyment of Lake Powell and lands adjacent thereto .”
United States v. Ingrao (D.V.I. 2021). “Moreover, I do not find that 1 54 U.S.C. § 100501 . 2 54 U.S.C. § 100723 (a).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.