It is declared to be the policy of Congress to continue the Soil Conservation and Domestic Allotment Act, as amended [16 U.S.C. 590a et seq.], for the purpose of conserving national resources, preventing the wasteful use of soil fertility, and of preserving, maintaining, and rebuilding the farm and ranch land resources in the national public interest; to accomplish these purposes through the encouragement of soil-building and soil-conserving crops and practices; to assist in the marketing of agricultural commodities for domestic consumption and for export; and to regulate interstate and foreign commerce in cotton, wheat, corn, and rice to the extent necessary to provide an orderly, adequate, and balanced flow of such commodities in interstate and foreign commerce through storage of reserve supplies, loans, marketing quotas, assisting farmers to obtain insofar as practicable, parity prices for such commodities and parity of income, and assisting consumers to obtain an adequate and steady supply of such commodities at fair prices.
Notes of Decisions
Fritz Thompson & Dora M. Thompson v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue, 322 F.2d 122 (5th Cir. 1963).
“§ 714b (i) and § 714c (a) clothing Commodity Credit Corporation with power and duty to support prices through crop loans; 7 U.S.C.A. § 1282 , declaring the policy to secure orderly balance in flow of crops through “ * * * loans * * * [and] assisting farmers to obtain * * *…”
Duncan v. Black, 324 S.W.2d 483 (Mo. Ct. App. 1959).
“It is necessary that we first understand the nature of the thing the parties were attempting to bargain: In the Agricultural Adjustment Act, Title 7 U.S.C.A. § 1282 , there is a declaration of *485 policy, and in section 1341 there is a legislative finding and declaration that…”
Luke v. Review Comm., 155 F. Supp. 719 (W.D. La. 1957).
“Throughout the Act, the emphasis -is on the farm, not on the owner or operator, and acreage allotments are based on the past planted history of cotton on the particular farm.”
United States v. N. Pac. Ry. Co., 116 F. Supp. 277 (D. Minnesota 1953).
“6 Defendant may submit findings of fact, conclusions of law, order for and form of judgment consistent with the foregoing.”
United States v. Holland, 164 F. Supp. 741 (D. Maryland 1958).
“See also the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938, 7 U.S.C.A. § 1282 . The government is so deeply involved in the grain business in this country that it practically controls the domestic market price.”
Dighton v. Coffman, 178 F. Supp. 114 (E.D. Ill. 1959).
“The declared policy of the Act as set forth in 7 U.S. C.A. § 1282, in part, states: “to regulate interstate and foreign commerce in * * * wheat * * * to the extent necessary to provide an orderly, adequate, and balanced flow of such commodities in interstate and foreign commerce…”
Georgia Power Co. v. Fletcher, 148 S.E.2d 915 (Ga. Ct. App. 1966).
“The purpose of these several related laws is stated in 7 USCA § 1282, where it is declared to be for the “conserving [of] national resources, preventing the wasteful use of soil fertility, and of preserving, maintaining and rebuilding the farm and ranch land resources in the…”
Morrow v. Clayton, 326 F.2d 36 (10th Cir. 1963).
“Appellees’ motion for summary judgment was sustained and this appeal followed, The complex statutory scheme Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938, as amended, is basic to a clear understanding of this case and must be discussed at some length.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.