U.S. Code » Title 7 » Chapter CHAPTER 1— COMMODITY EXCHANGES

7 U.S.C. § 12e

Repealed. Pub. L. 106–554, § 1(a)(5) [title I, § 123(a)(21)], Dec. 21, 2000, 114 Stat. 2763, 2763A–410

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 7 CasesGoogle Scholar

[repealed]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1985–1999 · leading case: Michael J. Clark, Petitioner, v. Commodity Futures Trading Comm'n, Respondent, 170 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 1999).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Michael J. Clark, Petitioner, v. Commodity Futures Trading Comm'n, Respondent, 170 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 1999). · cites it 2× “In moving to dismiss the petition for lack of jurisdiction in this court, the Commission argues that review of a Commission order affirming an exchange disciplinary order is governed by CEA § 8c, as amended, 7 U.S.C. § 12e (1998 Supp.). This last provision, according to the…”
Apex Oil Co. v. Dimauro, 110 F.R.D. 490 (S.D.N.Y. 1985). “” but directs that it “not disclose the evidence therefor____” 7 U.S.C. § 12e(l)(B) (emphasis added). The words “not disclose” are fairly construed as the converse of the term “make public” —that is, the Exchange is not to make public the evidence on it based its decision,…”
Gregory Jaunich v. United States Commodity Futures Trading Comm'n, 50 F.3d 518 (8th Cir. 1995). “We do agree with Jaunich that our construction of the CEA results in different courts reviewing functionally equivalent proceedings — direct review in the court of appeals under 7 U.”
— 7 U.S.C. § 12e(b) — 1 case
Michael J. Clark, Petitioner, v. Commodity Futures Trading Comm'n, Respondent, 170 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 1999). “In moving to dismiss the petition for lack of jurisdiction in this court, the Commission argues that review of a Commission order affirming an exchange disciplinary order is governed by CEA § 8c, as amended, 7 U.S.C. § 12e (1998 Supp.). This last provision, according to the…”
— 7 U.S.C. § 12e(l)(B) — 1 case
Apex Oil Co. v. Dimauro, 110 F.R.D. 490 (S.D.N.Y. 1985). “” but directs that it “not disclose the evidence therefor____” 7 U.S.C. § 12e(l)(B) (emphasis added). The words “not disclose” are fairly construed as the converse of the term “make public” —that is, the Exchange is not to make public the evidence on it based its decision,…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.