7 U.S.C. § 1551
Short title
This chapter may be cited as the “Federal Seed Act.”
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 13
cases, 1977–2006 · leading case: Agric. Servs. Ass'n, Inc. v. Ferry-Morse Seed Co., Inc., & Waldo Rohnert Co., Third-Party, 551 F.2d 1057 (3rd Cir. 1977).
Agric. Servs. Ass'n, Inc. v. Ferry-Morse Seed Co., Inc., & Waldo Rohnert Co., Third-Party, 551 F.2d 1057 (3rd Cir. 1977). “It found a violation of The Federal Seed Act, 7 U.S.C. § 1551 , et seq. by both W-R and F-M; that W-R breached its contract with F-M to deliver suitable and commercially acceptable and productive C/S variety okra seed; that F-M breached its contract with ASA to deliver suitable…”
Hanson v. Funk Seeds Int'l, 373 N.W.2d 30 (S.D. 1985). “NOTES [1] 7 U.S.C.S. § 1551 (1985). [2] SDCL ch. 38-12, et seq.”
Schmaltz v. Nissen, 431 N.W.2d 657 (S.D. 1988). “ISSUE ONE Does the Federal Seed Act and/or the South Dakota Seed Act preempt a warranty claim under the Uniform Commercial Code? Nissen asserts that this case is controlled by the Federal Seed Act ( 7 U.”
Duane Martin & Robert Rick v. The Joseph Harris Co., Inc., a Foreign Corp., 767 F.2d 296 (6th Cir. 1985). “e end that the aggrieved party may be put in as good a position as if the other party had fully performed____”), in order to put Martin and Rick in the same position as many of their neighboring farmers who purchased healthy seed, we hold that the proper measure of damages as…”
Nunes Turfgrass, Inc. v. Vaughan-Jacklin Seed Co., 6 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 41 (Cal. Ct. App. 1988). “) The provisions of the California Seed Law must be construed to conform as much as possible with the construction placed upon the Federal Seed Act ( 7 U.S.C. § 1551 et seq.) and regulations issued pursuant to that act.”
Webb v. Dessert Seed Co., Inc., 718 P.2d 1057 (Colo. 1986). “Further, while the authorities cited by the court of appeals reveal that seed distributors have a duty to properly label seeds, none of those authorities state that proper labeling is a seed distributor’s sole duty.”
Jacob Hartz Seed Co., Inc. v. Coleman, 612 S.W.2d 91 (Ark. 1981). “" As appellant points out, the Federal Seed Act, 7 U.S.C. §§ 1551 et seq., prohibits transporting seeds in interstate commerce that have a false label.”
Harris Moran Seed Co., Inc. v. Phillips, 949 So. 2d 916 (Ala. Civ. App. 2006). “) The federal law referenced in the foregoing contract provisions is the Federal Seed Act, 7 U.S.C. § 1551 et seq., which, among other things, prohibits the false labeling of agricultural seed packages.”
Jones v. Asgrow Seed Co., 749 F. Supp. 832 (N.D. Ohio 1990). “§ 1332 and 7 U.S.C. § 1551 . Plaintiffs are tomato growers, who along with J & B Tomato, Inc.”
Doeblers' Pennsylvania Hybrids, Inc. v. Doebler, 442 F.3d 812 (3rd Cir. 2006). “In addition, and depending on how the facts are developed on remand, we are troubled by the prospect that the assertion of trade secret protection may violate the Federal Seed Act, 7 U.S.C. §§ 1551 et seq. “The Federal Seed Act makes it unlawful for any person to transport or to…”
Moorer v. Hartz Seed Co., 120 F. Supp. 2d 1283 (M.D. Ala. 2000). “Counts eight, nine, and thirteen allege labeling violations under Alabama Code sections 2-26-7(b)(2), 2-26-ll(a)(2), and 7 U.S.C. §§ 1551 et seq. (the “Federal Seed Act”).”
Heart Seed Co. v. Chamnes, 637 P.2d 989 (Wash. Ct. App. 1981). “RCW *691 15.49.310. In adopting regulations and promoting uniformity, the Director is to be guided by officially recognized associations or regulations under the federal Seed Act, 7 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.