7 U.S.C. § 1596
Penalties
1956—Act
Act July 9, 1956, ch. 520, § 4, 70 Stat. 508, provided that:
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1975–2021 · leading case: Leslie Salt Co., a Delaware Corp. Cargill, Inc. v. United States, 55 F.3d 1388 (9th Cir. 1995).
Leslie Salt Co., a Delaware Corp. Cargill, Inc. v. United States, 55 F.3d 1388 (9th Cir. 1995). “§ 6038 (b)(1) (“If any person fails to furnish ... any information ... required under [this section], such person shall pay a penalty of $1,000 .”
Atlas Roofing Co., Inc. v. Occupational Saf. & Health Review Comm'n, United States Dep't Oflabor, 518 F.2d 990 (5th Cir. 1975). “7 U.S.C. § 1596 (b) (1970). Violation of provisions of Federal Seed Act.”
Moorer v. Hartz Seed Co., 120 F. Supp. 2d 1283 (M.D. Ala. 2000). “See 7 U.S.C.A. § 1596 (1999). Indeed, section 1596 states “[a]ny person who violates any provision of this chapter or the rules and regulations made and promulgated thereunder shall forfeit to the United States a sum, not less than $25 or more than $500, for each such violation,…”
Frontier AG, Inc. v. Nuseed Americas Inc. (D. Kan. 2019). “7 U.S.C. § 1596 (a). And, the Federal Seed Act authorizes the Secretary of Agriculture to institute an action against any person who has violated the Act and to apply to a court of appeals for enforcement of any order holding a person in violation of the Act.”
HempChain Farms, LLC v. Sack (N.D.N.Y. 2021). “" 7 U.S.C. § 1596 (b). Based on this statutory language, the Court concludes that there is no private cause of action under the Federal Seed Act.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.