7 U.S.C. § 17
Separability
If any provision of this chapter or the application thereof to any person or circumstances is held invalid, the validity of the remainder of the chapter and of the application of such provision to other persons and circumstances shall not be affected thereby.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1980–2022 · leading case: R&W Technical Servs. Ltd. v. Commodity Futures Trading Comm'n, 205 F.3d 165 (5th Cir. 2000).
R&W Technical Servs. Ltd. v. Commodity Futures Trading Comm'n, 205 F.3d 165 (5th Cir. 2000). “See 7 U.S.C. § 17 ; cf. Taucher v. Born, 53 F.”
Saharoff v. Stone, 638 F.2d 90 (9th Cir. 1980). “In O'Day, judicial review was available in enforcement proceedings as well as in direct appeals from reparation orders.”
Commodity Futures Trading Comm'n v. Fin. Tree, No. 2:20-cv-01184 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 4, 2022). “Defendants Committed Fraud By Commodity Pool Operators (“CPOs”) 16 and Associated Persons (“APs”) of CPOs in Violation of 7 U.S.C. § 17 6o(1)(A)-(B) (2018) (Count Three) 18 Section 1a(10)(A) of the Act, 7 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.